Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs Llama 4 Maverick

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

54.48/100
Margin
31.0pts
← winning
23.49/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated); Llama 4 Maverick #191 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Llama 4 Maverick share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max; 6 to Llama 4 Maverick.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
1
Llama 4 Maverick only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Llama 4 Maverick is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Llama 4 Maverick
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxΔLlama 4 Maverick
MathGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot measuredMarginNo overlapLlama 4 Maverick0.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputLlama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Maverick has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableLlama 4 Maverick121 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableLlama 4 Maverick0.95 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KLlama 4 Maverick1MLlama 4 Maverick lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 83%17.8%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource -16Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.17%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.2%33.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA Coding IndexSource 16.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
AA-LCRSource 67.3%46.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
CritPtSource 5.7%0.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%14.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.0%67.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-HLESource 23.4%4.8%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -6.0%-41.8%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.2%24.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.4%87.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.690%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.5%62.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 903Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLlama 4 MaverickResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.0%43.0%GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Llama 4 Maverick on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and Llama 4 Maverick today?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
API / mo$8,438
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Maverick
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,610
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.