Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs MiniMax M1 80k

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
54.48/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated); MiniMax M1 80k #190 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1 80k share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max; 0 to MiniMax M1 80k.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
13
MiniMax M1 80k only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1 80k is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for MiniMax M1 80k yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 80K for MiniMax M1 80k.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputMiniMax M1 80kNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableMiniMax M1 80kNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableMiniMax M1 80kNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KMiniMax M1 80k80KGPT-5.1-Codex-Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 83%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.17%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
AA-LCRSource 67.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 5.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 23.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -6.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1 80kResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1 80k on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1 80k today?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M1 80k: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.