Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Grok 4.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
60.42/100
Margin
0.5pts
← winning
59.97/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 #50 (Supported); Grok 4.1 #51 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 and Grok 4.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Grok 4; 1 to Grok 4.1.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok 4 only
16
Grok 4.1 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 and Grok 4.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Grok 4.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4Grok 4.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4Not availableGrok 4.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 454 tok/sGrok 4.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 415.60 sGrok 4.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4128KGrok 4.11MGrok 4.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.9%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 13.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 45.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
AA-LCRSource 68.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 23.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4Grok 4.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 53.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 and Grok 4.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 and Grok 4.1 today?

Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Grok 4.1: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.