Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok Code Fast 1 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

38.64/100
Margin
15.2pts
← winning
23.49/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok Code Fast 1 #180 (Supported); Llama 4 Maverick #191 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok Code Fast 1; 7 to Llama 4 Maverick.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
Grok Code Fast 1 only
1
Llama 4 Maverick only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Code Fast 1 is priced at $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Code Fast 1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick
CategoryGrok Code Fast 1ΔLlama 4 Maverick
CodingGrok Code Fast 170.8MarginNo overlapLlama 4 MaverickNot measured
MathGrok Code Fast 1Not measuredMarginNo overlapLlama 4 Maverick0.7

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok Code Fast 1$0.2 input / $1.5 outputLlama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Maverick has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok Code Fast 1172 tok/sLlama 4 Maverick121 tok/sGrok Code Fast 1 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok Code Fast 12.81 sLlama 4 Maverick0.95 sLlama 4 Maverick reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok Code Fast 1256KLlama 4 Maverick1MLlama 4 Maverick lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 75.7%17.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource -16Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 70.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.2%33.1%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 16.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-LCRSource 48.3%46.0%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.6%14.3%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 72.7%67.1%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-HLESource 7.5%4.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -36.0%-41.8%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.8%24.3%Llama 4 Maverick leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.5%87.3%Grok Code Fast 1 leads
Math
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.690%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 903Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok Code Fast 1Llama 4 MaverickResult
AA-IFBenchSource 41.4%43.0%Llama 4 Maverick leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok Code Fast 1 and Llama 4 Maverick today?

Grok Code Fast 1: $0.20 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Grok Code Fast 1
API / mo$1,275
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Maverick
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,610
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.