Model comparison
Holo3-35B-A3B vs Inkling
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo3-35B-A3B unranked (Not scored); Inkling #20 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo3-35B-A3B and Inkling share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3-35B-A3B; 32 to Inkling.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3-35B-A3B only
- 1
- Inkling only
- 32
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Holo3-35B-A3B makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Inkling is the better fit if you need the larger 1M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Holo3-35B-A3B and Inkling finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Inkling is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-35B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo3-35B-A3B | Inkling | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo3-35B-A3BNot available | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo3-35B-A3BNot available | InklingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo3-35B-A3BNot available | InklingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo3-35B-A3B64K | Inkling1M | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticHolo3-35B-A3B wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 82.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | — | 1257 | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 32.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 36.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1239 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 836 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 23.7% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 46% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 30% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 40.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 87.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 29.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 2.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 40.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 63.1% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | — | 97.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3-35B-A3B | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchSource | — | 79.8% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Holo3-35B-A3B or Inkling?
Holo3-35B-A3B and Inkling are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Holo3-35B-A3B or Inkling?
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 69.4. Inkling stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.