Knowledge
Directional only- Inkling
- 51.6
- Interfaze Beta
- 89.9
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Inkling vs Interfaze Beta
Updated August 29, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
3 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Interfaze Beta
Interfaze Beta has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Inkling
Inkling has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Interfaze Beta
Interfaze Beta has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-rates
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
12 Inkling only
3 Shared
6 Interfaze Beta only
- Shared results
- 3
- Inkling only
- 12
- Interfaze Beta only
- 6
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
2 categories use different evidence sets. Those rows remain visible for coverage context but do not name a winner.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Multimodal
Directional only- Inkling
- 76.5
- Interfaze Beta
- 71.1
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- Directional only
Agentic
Not comparable- Inkling
- 69.4
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Inkling
- 68.6
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 2 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Inkling
- Not measured
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Inkling
- 97.1
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Inkling
- Not measured
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Inkling
- 79.8
- Interfaze Beta
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Inkling | Interfaze Beta | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 51.6 | 89.9 | Directional only2 vs 1 rows | Directional only |
| Multimodal | 76.5 | 71.1 | Directional only2 vs 1 rows | Directional only |
| Agentic | 69.4 | Not measured | Not comparable2 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 68.6 | Not measured | Not comparable2 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | 97.1 | Not measured | Not comparable1 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | 79.8 | Not measured | Not comparable1 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
MMMU-Pro
Multimodal
GPQA
Knowledge
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Inkling
- $0.00421
- Fits in one request
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.00325
- Fits in one request
Interfaze Beta has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Inkling
- $0.10754
- Fits in one request
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.0855
- Fits in one request
Interfaze Beta has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Inkling
- $0.159
- Fits in one request
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.365
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
Inkling has the lower modeled cost
Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationInklingInterfaze Beta
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Inkling
1M
Interfaze Beta
1M
API model ID
Inkling
Not sourced
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Inkling
$0.374 per 1M cached input tokens
Interfaze Beta
Not published
Documented inputs
Inkling
Not sourced
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Inkling
Not sourced
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Provider availability
Inkling
Not sourced
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Inkling
Hybrid
Interfaze Beta
Reasoning
Weight access
Inkling
Open Weight
Interfaze Beta
Proprietary
License
Inkling
Open Weight
Interfaze Beta
Proprietary
Release date
Inkling
2026-07-15
Interfaze Beta
2026-05-11
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- Repository review: $0.10754 vs $0.0855. Cache-heavy agent loop: $0.159 vs $0.365.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 1M.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence21 rows
Agentic
Coding
Knowledge
GPQA
Inkling87.9%SourceInterfaze Beta89.9%SourceInterfaze Beta leads this result
GPQA-D
Inkling87.9%SourceInterfaze Beta89.9%SourceInterfaze Beta leads this result
HLE
Inkling46%SourceInterfaze Beta—Not directly comparable
HLE w/o tools
Inkling30%SourceInterfaze Beta—Not directly comparable
MMMLU
Inkling—Interfaze Beta90.9%SourceNot directly comparable
Math
AIME26
Inkling97.1%SourceInterfaze Beta—Not directly comparable
Multimodal
MMMU-Pro
Inkling73.5%SourceInterfaze Beta71.1%SourceInkling leads this result
CharXiv
Inkling82%SourceInterfaze Beta—Not directly comparable
CharXiv w/o tools
Inkling78.1%SourceInterfaze Beta—Not directly comparable
OCRBench V2
Inkling—Interfaze Beta70.7%SourceNot directly comparable
olmOCR
Inkling—Interfaze Beta85.7%SourceNot directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Inkling—Interfaze Beta82.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Inkling or Interfaze Beta?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Inkling or Interfaze Beta?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Inkling or Interfaze Beta?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Inkling or Interfaze Beta?
For the stated presets, chat costs $0.00421 on Inkling and $0.00325 on Interfaze Beta; repository review costs $0.10754 and $0.0855; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $0.159 and $0.365. Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Which has the larger context window, Inkling or Interfaze Beta?
Both models list the same context window, 1M.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 29, 2026
Watch Inkling vs Interfaze Beta
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.