Model comparison
Inkling vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Inkling #17; MiMo-V2-Omni unranked
BenchAlign evidence: Inkling not scored; MiMo-V2-Omni supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Inkling and MiMo-V2-Omni share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Inkling; 14 to MiMo-V2-Omni.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Inkling only
- 15
- MiMo-V2-Omni only
- 14
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Inkling has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 69 versus 66. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
MiMo-V2-Omni is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Inkling | Δ | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Inkling68.6 | Margin→ 6.2 | MiMo-V2-Omni74.8 |
| Agentic | Inkling69.4 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Knowledge | Inkling51.7 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Math | Inkling97.1 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Multimodal | Inkling76.5 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
| Inst. Following | Inkling79.8 | MarginNo overlap | MiMo-V2-OmniNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 77.6%B 74.8%Winner: InklingΔ 2.8SWE-bench Verified: Inkling scored 77.6%; MiMo-V2-Omni scored 74.8%. Inkling wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Inkling | MiMo-V2-Omni | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | InklingNot available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | InklingNot available | MiMo-V2-OmniNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Inkling1M | MiMo-V2-Omni262K | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic6 benchmarks
CodingMiMo-V2-Omni wins5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.9% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 46% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 30% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 35.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 82.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 19.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -17.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 18.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Inkling | MiMo-V2-Omni | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | 97.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Inkling or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 77.6% and 74.8%.
Which is better for coding, Inkling or MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 68.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.