Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Interfaze Beta vs Kimi K3
Updated October 2, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. 3 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
- Shared results
- 3
- Interfaze Beta only
- 6
- Kimi K3 only
- 45
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Supported: Kimi K3How the comparison works
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Interfaze Beta
Interfaze Beta has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-ratesCache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Interfaze Beta
Interfaze Beta has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Confidence: listed-ratesCoding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Interfaze Beta is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limitedAgentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Interfaze Beta is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
—Interfaze Beta61.4Kimi K3
Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8
The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
Same basis rules as the category table below
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
6 Interfaze Beta only
3 Shared
45 Kimi K3 only
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
MMMU-ProMultimodal
Normalized gap 10.5Interfaze Beta:71.1%Kimi K3:81.6%GPQAKnowledge
Normalized gap 3.6Interfaze Beta:89.9%Kimi K3:93.5%
Bars run 0–100 on each benchmark’s normalized display scale
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- 68.1
- Supported · #8/119
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 12 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- 61.4
- Supported · #18/144
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 1 vs 14 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- 65.8
- #18/27
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- 28.6
- Unranked · 5 rankable rows
- Kimi K3
- 89.4
- #1/49
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 1 vs 3 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- 67.9
- Supported · #18/171
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 3 vs 6 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Interfaze Beta
- Not ranked
- Kimi K3
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Interfaze Beta | Kimi K3 | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not ranked | 68.1Supported · #8/119 | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 12 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not ranked | 61.4Supported · #18/144 | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 1 vs 14 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not ranked | 65.8#18/27 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | 28.6Unranked · 5 rankable rows | 89.4#1/49 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 1 vs 3 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not ranked | 67.9Supported · #18/171 | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 3 vs 6 public rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.00325
- Fits in one request
- Kimi K3
- $0.0105
- Fits in one request
Interfaze Beta has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.0855
- Fits in one request
- Kimi K3
- $0.195
- Fits in one request
Interfaze Beta has the lower modeled cost
Costs use the listed standard API rates.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Interfaze Beta
- $0.365
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
- Kimi K3
- $0.27
- Fits in one request
Kimi K3 has the lower modeled cost
Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationInterfaze BetaKimi K3
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Interfaze Beta
1M
Kimi K3
1.05M
API model ID
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Kimi K3
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Interfaze Beta
Not published
Kimi K3
$0.3 per 1M cached input tokens
Documented inputs
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Kimi K3
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Kimi K3
Not sourced
Provider availability
Interfaze Beta
Not sourced
Kimi K3
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Interfaze Beta
Reasoning
Kimi K3
Reasoning
Weight access
Interfaze Beta
Proprietary
Kimi K3
Pending
License
Interfaze Beta
Proprietary
Kimi K3
Pending
Release date
Interfaze Beta
2026-05-11
Kimi K3
2026-07-16
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- Repository review: $0.0855 vs $0.195. Cache-heavy agent loop: $0.365 vs $0.27.
- Context tradeoff
- Kimi K3 has the larger documented window (1.05M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Questions
Which is better, Interfaze Beta or Kimi K3?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Interfaze Beta or Kimi K3?
Interfaze Beta is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Interfaze Beta or Kimi K3?
Interfaze Beta is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Interfaze Beta or Kimi K3?
For the stated presets, chat costs $0.00325 on Interfaze Beta and $0.0105 on Kimi K3; repository review costs $0.0855 and $0.195; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $0.365 and $0.27. Interfaze Beta has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.
Which has the larger context window, Interfaze Beta or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 has the larger documented context window: 1.05M, compared with 1M.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence54 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K388.3%SourceNot directly comparable
BrowseComp
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K391.2%SourceNot directly comparable
DeepSearchQA
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K395.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Toolathlon-Verified
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K373.2%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K384.2%SourceNot directly comparable
AutomationBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K330.8%SourceNot directly comparable
JobBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K352.9%SourceNot directly comparable
APEX-Agents
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K337.6%SourceNot directly comparable
SpreadsheetBench 2
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K334.8%SourceNot directly comparable
DECK-Bench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K373.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K380.9%SourceNot directly comparable
ApprenticeBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K318%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
Spider 2.0-Lite
Interfaze Beta52.9%SourceKimi K3—Not directly comparable
DeepSWE
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K367.5%SourceNot directly comparable
CursorBench 3.2
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K360.8%SourceNot directly comparable
FrontierSWE
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K381.2%SourceNot directly comparable
ProgramBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K377.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Kimi Code Bench v2
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K372.9%SourceNot directly comparable
sweMarathon
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K342%SourceNot directly comparable
PostTrain Bench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K336.6%SourceNot directly comparable
MLS-Bench Lite
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K348.3%SourceNot directly comparable
VulcanBench v3
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K373.7%SourceNot directly comparable
OpenHarmony Bench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K357.3%SourceNot directly comparable
FrontierSWE v2
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K325.9%SourceNot directly comparable
LiveCodeBench (Vals)
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K387.2%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench (Vals)
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K393.4%SourceNot directly comparable
PostTrainBench v1.1
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K332.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
Multimodal
OCRBench V2
Interfaze Beta70.7%SourceKimi K3—Not directly comparable
olmOCR
Interfaze Beta85.7%SourceKimi K3—Not directly comparable
RefCOCO (avg)
Interfaze Beta82.1%SourceKimi K3—Not directly comparable
MMMU-Pro
Interfaze Beta71.1%SourceKimi K381.6%SourceKimi K3 leads this result
OfficeQA Pro
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K363.3%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ Python
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K383.4%SourceNot directly comparable
CharXiv w/o tools
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K384.8%SourceNot directly comparable
CharXiv
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K391.3%SourceNot directly comparable
MathVision
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K394.3%SourceNot directly comparable
MathVision w/ Python
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K397.8%SourceNot directly comparable
BabyVision w/ Python
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K385.7%SourceNot directly comparable
ZeroBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K323.0%SourceNot directly comparable
ZeroBench w/ Python
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K341.0%SourceNot directly comparable
WorldVQA ForceAnswer
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K351.0%SourceNot directly comparable
OmniDocBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K391.1%SourceNot directly comparable
PerceptionBench
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K358.5%SourceNot directly comparable
Knowledge
GPQA
Interfaze Beta89.9%SourceKimi K393.5%SourceKimi K3 leads this result
GPQA-D
Interfaze Beta89.9%SourceKimi K393.5%SourceKimi K3 leads this result
MMMLU
Interfaze Beta90.9%SourceKimi K3—Not directly comparable
HLE
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K356%SourceNot directly comparable
HLE w/o tools
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K343.5%SourceNot directly comparable
GPQA Diamond (Vals)
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K392.9%SourceNot directly comparable
MMLU-Pro (Vals)
Interfaze Beta—Kimi K388.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
54 public results · 3 shared
Watch Interfaze Beta vs Kimi K3
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
Last updated October 2, 2026