Skip to main content

Model comparison

Llama 4 Maverick vs Mercury 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
22.7/100
No comparison
Inception
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Llama 4 Maverick #201 (Supported); Mercury 2 #129 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Llama 4 Maverick and Mercury 2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Llama 4 Maverick; 0 to Mercury 2.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
Llama 4 Maverick only
18
Mercury 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Llama 4 Maverick and Mercury 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mercury 2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mercury 2 is priced at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Maverick. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensLlama 4 Maverick$0 input / $0 outputMercury 2$0.25 input / $0.75 outputLlama 4 Maverick has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondLlama 4 Maverick121 tok/sMercury 2789 tok/sMercury 2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenLlama 4 Maverick0.95 sMercury 23.88 sLlama 4 Maverick reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensLlama 4 Maverick1MMercury 2128KLlama 4 Maverick lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 7Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
AA Coding IndexSource 16.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
AA-LCRSource 46.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 67.1%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 24.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.690%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 896Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkLlama 4 MaverickMercury 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 43.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Llama 4 Maverick and Mercury 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Llama 4 Maverick and Mercury 2 today?

Llama 4 Maverick: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mercury 2: $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Llama 4 Maverick
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,610
Break-even
Mercury 2
API / mo$750
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.