Skip to main content

MAI-Thinking-1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

MAI-Thinking-1

65

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

64

0 categoriesvs4 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #12

Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
46vs56.1

+10.1 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
71vs72

+1.0 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
69.9vs81.6

+11.7 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
85vs93.4

+8.4 difference

Operational Comparison

MAI-Thinking-1

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

256K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick MAI-Thinking-1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

MAI-Thinking-1 finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 64. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

MAI-Thinking-1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 65 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46% and 49.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 69.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 71. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 56.1 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, MAI-Thinking-1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 85. MAI-Thinking-1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.