Model comparison
Nova Pro vs o1-pro
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Nova Pro #206 (Supported); o1-pro #148 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Nova Pro and o1-pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Nova Pro; 1 to o1-pro.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Nova Pro only
- 11
- o1-pro only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Nova Pro and o1-pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
o1-pro has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Nova Pro | Δ | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Nova ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | o1-pro79.0 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nova ProNot available | o1-pro$150 input / $600 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nova Pro141 tok/s | o1-proNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nova Pro0.81 s | o1-proNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nova Pro128K | o1-pro200K | o1-pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 14% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 20.8% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 7.7% | 18.9% | o1-pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 49.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 3.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -47.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 17.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 77.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 44.3% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova Pro | o1-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 38.1% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Nova Pro and o1-pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Nova Pro and o1-pro today?
Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable o1-pro: $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.