Skip to main content

Model comparison

Ornith-1.0-397B vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
DeepReinforce AI
N/A
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #66 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-397B; 2 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Updated July 18, 2026
Shared results
0
Ornith-1.0-397B only
7
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Ornith-1.0-397B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensOrnith-1.0-397B256KQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128KOrnith-1.0-397B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 77.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 62.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkOrnith-1.0-397BQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 8.481%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Ornith-1.0-397B and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) today?

Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 18, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.