Ornith-1.0-397B vs SWE-1.7
Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
SWE-1.7 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Ornith-1.0-397B
73
SWE-1.7
75
Pick SWE-1.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-397B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Category Breakdown
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Δ | SWE-1.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 77.5 | → 4.0 | 81.5 |
| Coding | 69.7 | — | — |
Operational Comparison
Ornith-1.0-397B
SWE-1.7
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
256K
Quick Verdict
Pick SWE-1.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-397B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
SWE-1.7 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 75 versus 73. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
SWE-1.7's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.5 against 77.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 77.5% to 81.5%.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Ornith-1.0-397B or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 77.5% and 81.5%.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Ornith-1.0-397B or SWE-1.7?
SWE-1.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 77.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.