Skip to main content
Radar

Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.

Follow model changes

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

Decision reading
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 19 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Released Sep 18, 2026 see all recent releases

Data as of September 18, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Instruction Following ranks #29. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Validate before choosing

19 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.

Voice benchmark evidence

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash omni evaluation is an owner-defined voice evaluation. Its result stays separate from BenchLM's weighted text-model ranking.

WildClawBench-MM
71.0
UniClawBench
69.6
OmniVideoBench (static)
63.4
OmniVideoBench (Qwen Code)
67.8
StreamingBench
80.8
AliMeeting DER / cpWER
3.4 / 17.2
VoiceBench
91.6
Provider API ID
qwen3.8-omni-flash
Provider launch snapshot · Qwen · 2026-09-18 · higher is better except the ASR rows, where lower is better

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

Unranked

field median 56.3

Not eligible for a public rank

Price

API rate not published

input median $0.95

No comparable first-party hosted token rate

Speed

Not measured

field median 90 tok/s

Time to first token not measured

Context

1Mtokens

field median 256,000

Maximum output length is tracked separately

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic2/2 verified
  2. Coding5/5 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. Knowledge3/3 verified
  5. MathNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Multimodal8/8 verified
  8. Inst. Following1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerifiedScore pending
CodingRank #45 of 154Percentile 71stWeight 20%5 benchmarksVerified53.5
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeRank #54 of 184Percentile 71stWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified54.9
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%8 benchmarksVerified85.1
Inst. FollowingRank #29 of 124Percentile 77thWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified87.7

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding5 rows
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SWE-bench ProScore63.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 81.2%

Gap17.9 behindWeightWeighted 25%
SWE MultilingualScore80.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.5%

Gap9 behindWeightWeighted 5%
NL2RepoScore48.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 65.4%

Gap16.5 behindWeightDisplay only
DeepSWEScore57.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 75.4%

Gap17.6 behindWeightDisplay only
LiveCodeBench v6Score92.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 93.2%

Gap0.6 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic2 rows
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
CoWorkBenchScore75.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash · 75.3%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
AndroidWorldScore87.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash · 87.1%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
Knowledge3 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
HLEHumanity's Last ExamScore36.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 65%

Gap28.5 behindWeightWeighted 35%
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore91%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap5 behindWeightWeighted 7%
GPQA-DGPQA DiamondScore91.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0%

Gap5 behindWeightDisplay only
Multimodal8 rows
Multimodal benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
CharXivCharXiv ReasoningScore91.4%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5%

Gap2.1 behindWeightWeighted 20%
Vision2WebScore62.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 69.0%

Gap6.1 behindWeightDisplay only
ERQAScore71.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 77.8%

Gap6.8 behindWeightDisplay only
LVBenchScore76.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Gemini 3.8 Flash · 87.1%

Gap10.2 behindWeightDisplay only
RealWorldQAScore87.7%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5%

Gap0.8 behindWeightDisplay only
MathVisionScore91.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2%

Gap3.4 behindWeightDisplay only
MathVision w/ PythonMathVision with PythonScore96.2%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Kimi K3 · 97.8%

Gap1.6 behindWeightDisplay only
CharXiv w/o toolsCharXiv Reasoning without toolsScore83.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 88.9%

Gap5.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
IFBenchInstruction Following BenchmarkScore81.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85%

Gap3.5 behindWeightWeighted 70%

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
qwen3.8-omni-flashAlibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Hosted only. Qwen serves qwen3.8-omni-flash through the Qianwen AI Platform and Alibaba Cloud Model Studio with OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions and Responses APIs, text, image, audio and video input, a 1,000,000-token context window, and reasoning_effort levels of low, medium, and xhigh (default). A separate streaming sibling, qwen3.8-omni-flash-realtime, is served over WebSocket and WebRTC for continuous audio-visual interaction; its throughput and latency figures are not attributed to this row. No weights are published.
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Current
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing recordAlibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Sep 18, 2026 · you are here

    Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

    Not publicly ranked · Price not listed

Base entry

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Hosted only. Qwen serves qwen3.8-omni-flash through the Qianwen AI Platform and Alibaba Cloud Model Studio with OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions and Responses APIs, text, image, audio and video input, a 1,000,000-token context window, and reasoning_effort levels of low, medium, and xhigh (default). A separate streaming sibling, qwen3.8-omni-flash-realtime, is served over WebSocket and WebRTC for continuous audio-visual interaction; its throughput and latency figures are not attributed to this row. No weights are published.

Official exact-value snapshot from Qwen's September 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash launch post. BenchLM maps only the text and vision table rows that match existing protocols. GPQA Diamond lands on both the weighted GPQA lane and the display GPQA-D lane, matching the existing provider-row convention; MathVision and CharXiv (RQ) keep their paired no-Code-Interpreter and Code-Interpreter values on separate keys; LiveCodeBench v6, DeepSWE 1.1, NL2Repo-Bench, and the in-house CoWorkBench stay display-only. HLE is stored on the weighted lane only, because Qwen labels the row as GPT-4o-judged without stating a no-tools setting. ClawEval-MM is reported as a pass@3 and average pair and stays out of schema, as on the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next row. The launch's 34-row omni table (WildClawBench-MM, UniClawBench, AgenticVBench, OmniGAIA, DailyOmni, WorldSense, AVUT, JoinAVBench, OmniVideoBench, Video-MME-v2, LVOmniBench, OmniCloze, OmniCap-IF, QIVD, StreamingBench, the four multi-speaker ASR sets, WenetSpeech, FLEURS ASR and S2TT, SpotSoundBench, MMAU, MMAR, MMSU, LongAudioSpan, the three music sets, Audio MultiChallenge, WildSpeech, and VoiceBench) has no equivalent in the weighted schema and is recorded as provider evidence on the voice-benchmark page instead of being collapsed into non-equivalent keys. The Agentic Omni Understanding table, which pairs static and Qwen Code agent runs on OmniVideoBench (63.4 to 67.8), Video-MME-v2 (65.0 to 71.3), and LVOmniBench (63.3 to 73.6), is a harness comparison and is recorded there too. The realtime throughput and latency table belongs to qwen3.8-omni-flash-realtime and is not stored on this row.

19 of 446 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #29, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #54. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Radar

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.

Questions

How does Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has 19 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.

Is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash good for knowledge and understanding?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #54 out of 184 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 54.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash good for coding and programming?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #45 out of 154 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 53.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash good for instruction following?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #29 out of 124 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 87.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Does Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash currently has 19 source-displayable rows across 446 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.

Compare Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash with every tracked model489 comparisons

Last updated September 18, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.