Capability
Unranked
field median 56.3
Not eligible for a public rank
Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.
Follow model changesReleased Sep 18, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 18, 2026 · How the score is built
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash will be repriced, updated or retired. Get each notice with its source and date. Follow model changes
Share or export
Instruction Following ranks #29. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
19 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash omni evaluation is an owner-defined voice evaluation. Its result stays separate from BenchLM's weighted text-model ranking.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 56.3
Not eligible for a public rank
Price
API rate not published
input median $0.95
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 90 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 256,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #45 of 154Percentile 71stWeight 20%5 benchmarksVerified | 53.5 | #45 of 154 | 71st | 20% | 5 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank #54 of 184Percentile 71stWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 54.9 | #54 of 184 | 71st | 12% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%8 benchmarksVerified | 85.1 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 8 benchmarks | Verified |
| Inst. FollowingRank #29 of 124Percentile 77thWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | 87.7 | #29 of 124 | 77th | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Pro | Score63.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 81.2% | Gap17.9 behind | WeightWeighted 25% | Provider exact |
| SWE Multilingual | Score80.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.5% | Gap9 behind | WeightWeighted 5% | Provider exact |
| NL2Repo | Score48.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · 65.4% | Gap16.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| DeepSWE | Score57.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 75.4% | Gap17.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Score92.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 93.2% | Gap0.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoWorkBench | Score75.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash · 75.3% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| AndroidWorld | Score87.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash · 87.1% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLEHumanity's Last Exam | Score36.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 65% | Gap28.5 behind | WeightWeighted 35% | Provider exact |
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score91% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Gap5 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
| GPQA-DGPQA Diamond | Score91.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96.0% | Gap5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivCharXiv Reasoning | Score91.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 93.5% | Gap2.1 behind | WeightWeighted 20% | Provider exact |
| Vision2Web | Score62.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 69.0% | Gap6.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| ERQA | Score71.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 77.8% | Gap6.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| LVBench | Score76.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Gemini 3.8 Flash · 87.1% | Gap10.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| RealWorldQA | Score87.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · 88.5% | Gap0.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MathVision | Score91.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.8 Max · 95.2% | Gap3.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| MathVision w/ PythonMathVision with Python | Score96.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Kimi K3 · 97.8% | Gap1.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| CharXiv w/o toolsCharXiv Reasoning without tools | Score83.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 88.9% | Gap5.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchInstruction Following Benchmark | Score81.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85% | Gap3.5 behind | WeightWeighted 70% | Provider exact |
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Sep 18, 2026 · you are here
Qwen3.8-Omni-FlashNot publicly ranked · Price not listed
Base entry
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Hosted only. Qwen serves qwen3.8-omni-flash through the Qianwen AI Platform and Alibaba Cloud Model Studio with OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions and Responses APIs, text, image, audio and video input, a 1,000,000-token context window, and reasoning_effort levels of low, medium, and xhigh (default). A separate streaming sibling, qwen3.8-omni-flash-realtime, is served over WebSocket and WebRTC for continuous audio-visual interaction; its throughput and latency figures are not attributed to this row. No weights are published.
Official exact-value snapshot from Qwen's September 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash launch post. BenchLM maps only the text and vision table rows that match existing protocols. GPQA Diamond lands on both the weighted GPQA lane and the display GPQA-D lane, matching the existing provider-row convention; MathVision and CharXiv (RQ) keep their paired no-Code-Interpreter and Code-Interpreter values on separate keys; LiveCodeBench v6, DeepSWE 1.1, NL2Repo-Bench, and the in-house CoWorkBench stay display-only. HLE is stored on the weighted lane only, because Qwen labels the row as GPT-4o-judged without stating a no-tools setting. ClawEval-MM is reported as a pass@3 and average pair and stays out of schema, as on the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next row. The launch's 34-row omni table (WildClawBench-MM, UniClawBench, AgenticVBench, OmniGAIA, DailyOmni, WorldSense, AVUT, JoinAVBench, OmniVideoBench, Video-MME-v2, LVOmniBench, OmniCloze, OmniCap-IF, QIVD, StreamingBench, the four multi-speaker ASR sets, WenetSpeech, FLEURS ASR and S2TT, SpotSoundBench, MMAU, MMAR, MMSU, LongAudioSpan, the three music sets, Audio MultiChallenge, WildSpeech, and VoiceBench) has no equivalent in the weighted schema and is recorded as provider evidence on the voice-benchmark page instead of being collapsed into non-equivalent keys. The Agentic Omni Understanding table, which pairs static and Qwen Code agent runs on OmniVideoBench (63.4 to 67.8), Video-MME-v2 (65.0 to 71.3), and LVOmniBench (63.3 to 73.6), is a harness comparison and is recorded there too. The realtime throughput and latency table belongs to qwen3.8-omni-flash-realtime and is not stored on this row.
19 of 446 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #29, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #54. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Alibaba · Model release
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has 19 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #54 out of 184 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 54.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #45 out of 154 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 53.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks #29 out of 124 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 87.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
No. Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash currently has 19 source-displayable rows across 446 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Related resources
Last updated September 18, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.