Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

The share of legal-deliverable rubric criteria passed, pooled across three judges before the hallucination gate.

Evaluation results published by Artificial Analysis and Harvey. Published v1.1 aggregate results; legal task documents and submissions remain private.

Previous release

Harvey LAB-AA v1.0 remains a separate historical table. Version 1.1 changes the task set and grading, so the scores are not comparable across versions.

View Harvey LAB-AA v1.0

Criterion Pass Rate on Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass — 2026-10-15 capture

We mirror the published criterion pass rate view for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass. Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) leads the public snapshot at 96.0%, followed by Muse Wonder Full (Max) (95.5%) and Muse Wonder (Max) (95.1%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

24 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated 2026-10-15 capture

Criterion Pass Rate table (24 models)

Criterion Pass Rate results for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
96.0%
Not reportedClosed
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
95.5%
Not reportedClosed
3Muse Wonder (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
95.1%
Not reportedClosed
4Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AIMax · Stirrup
93.0%
Not reportedPending
5Mistral Large 4 PreviewMistralStirrup
93.0%
Not reportedPending
6GLM-5.3 (Max)Z.AIMax · Stirrup
93.0%
Not reportedOpen
7Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)xAIXhigh · Stirrup
92.8%
Not reportedClosed
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)DeepSeekMax · Stirrup
92.5%
Not reportedOpen
9Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
92.4%
Not reportedClosed
10Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
92.1%
Not reportedClosed
11GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AIStirrup
91.1%
Not reportedOpen
12GPT-6 Astra (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
90.6%
Not reportedClosed
13GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
90.6%
Not reportedClosed
14Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GoogleHigh · Stirrup
90.5%
Not reportedClosed
15Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
90.0%
Not reportedClosed
16Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)AnthropicXhigh · Stirrup
88.0%
Not reportedClosed
17Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)AnthropicHigh · Stirrup
87.9%
Not reportedClosed
18Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)AnthropicMax · Stirrup
87.7%
Not reportedClosed
19Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)AnthropicMedium · Stirrup
87.5%
Not reportedClosed
20Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)AnthropicLow · Stirrup
87.5%
Not reportedClosed
21GPT-6 Sol (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
86.9%
Not reportedClosed
22GPT-6 Luna (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
86.0%
Not reportedClosed
23MiniMax-M3MiniMaxStirrup
85.6%
Not reportedOpen
24Inkling (Xhigh)Thinking Machines LabXhigh · Stirrup
81.3%
Not reportedOpen

How to read this leaderboard

Operator receipt: 24 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) at 96.0%.

Honest limit: Private tasks and model judges limit independent reproduction. Criterion pass and hallucination-gated all-pass rates measure different outcomes.

How to read Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Version 1.1 tests legal deliverables on 120 private tasks across 24 practice areas in the Stirrup agent harness. A three-judge panel grades each deliverable, and a separate check compares its claims with the source documents.

The headline hallucination-gated all-pass rate credits a task only when every rubric criterion passes and the deliverable contains no material hallucination, averaged across three judges. Criterion pass rate pools passed criteria across all three judges before the hallucination gate. The two metrics have separate tables.

Artificial Analysis developed v1.1 with Harvey and says its scores are not comparable with v1.0. We keep every published effort configuration and preserve the earlier table separately. These new results stay outside overall and category rankings.

The published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass snapshot places Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) first at 96.0%. The third row is 0.9 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 3.9 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

24 models are shown for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass

Year

2026

Tasks

120 private legal tasks across 24 practice areas

Format

Criterion Pass Rate

Difficulty

Professional legal work

Stirrup agent harness on 120 private legal tasks across 24 practice areas. Version 1.1 changes the task set and grading; scores are not comparable with v1.0. Each effort and fallback setting remains a separate configuration. Results are display only.

Freshness and provenance

Version

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Refresh cadence

Published leaderboard snapshots

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Private legal tasks; only published aggregates mirrored

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass measure?

The share of legal-deliverable rubric criteria passed, pooled across three judges before the hallucination gate.

Which model leads the published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass snapshot?

Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) currently leads the published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass snapshot with 96.0% criterion pass rate. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass?

The 2026-10-15 capture snapshot contains 24 AI models.

Last updated: 2026-10-15 capture · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.