Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Legal-agent task success requiring every rubric criterion to pass and no material hallucination, averaged across three judges.

Evaluation results published by Artificial Analysis and Harvey. Published v1.1 aggregate results; legal task documents and submissions remain private.

All releases

This page carries both Harvey LAB-AA releases: v1.1 above, then its criterion pass rates and the archived v1.0 table. Version 1.1 changes the task set and grading, so the scores are not comparable across versions.

Jump to Harvey LAB-AA v1.0

Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate on Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 — 2026-11-12 capture

We mirror the published hallucination-gated all-pass rate view for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1. Muse Wonder Full (Max) leads the public snapshot at 13.1%, followed by Muse Wonder (Max) (10.0%) and Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) (9.4%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

25 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated 2026-11-12 capture

Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate table (25 models)

Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate results for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Muse Wonder Full (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
13.1%
Not reportedClosed
2Muse Wonder (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
10.0%
Not reportedClosed
3Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)xAIXhigh · Stirrup
9.4%
Not reportedClosed
4Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)MetaMax · Stirrup
8.9%
Not reportedClosed
5GPT-6 Astra (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
8.6%
Not reportedClosed
6Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
7.2%
Not reportedClosed
7GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
6.9%
Not reportedClosed
8Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
6.4%
Not reportedClosed
9Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AIMax · Stirrup
5.3%
Not reportedOpen
10Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
4.2%
Not reportedClosed
11Gemini 4 Argon (High)GoogleHigh · Stirrup
3.9%
Not reportedClosed
12GPT-6 Sol (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
3.6%
Not reportedClosed
13GPT-6 Luna (Max)OpenAIMax · Stirrup
3.3%
Not reportedClosed
14Mistral Large 4 PreviewMistralStirrup
3.1%
Not reportedClosed
15Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)AnthropicMax, Default Fallback · Stirrup
2.8%
Not reportedClosed
16DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)DeepSeekMax · Stirrup
1.7%
Not reportedOpen
17GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AIStirrup
0.8%
Not reportedOpen
18Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)AnthropicMax · Stirrup
0.6%
Not reportedClosed
19GLM-5.3 (Max)Z.AIMax · Stirrup
0.3%
Not reportedOpen
20Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)GoogleHigh · Stirrup
0.0%
Not reportedClosed
21MiniMax-M3MiniMaxStirrup
0.0%
Not reportedOpen
22Inkling SmallThinking Machines LabStirrup
0.0%
Not reportedOpen
23Inkling (Xhigh)Thinking Machines LabXhigh · Stirrup
0.0%
Not reportedOpen
24Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogleStirrup
0.0%
Not reportedClosed
25Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleStirrup
0.0%
Not reportedClosed

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass

Criterion Pass Rate is a percentage. Published zero results remain zero; unreported configurations are absent. Capture dates do not establish evaluation dates.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Criterion Pass; source configurations remain separate from the canonical benchmark table.
Source rankSource model or configurationCriterion Pass RateSource setupParameters (B)Open / closed
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta96.0%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
2Muse Wonder Full (Max)Meta95.5%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
3Muse Wonder (Max)Meta95.1%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
4Gemini 4 Argon (High)Google94.8%High · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
5Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AI93.0%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
6Mistral Large 4 PreviewMistral93.0%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
7GLM-5.3 (Max)Z.AI93.0%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
8Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)xAI92.8%Xhigh · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)DeepSeek92.5%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
10Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)Anthropic92.4%Max, Default Fallback · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
11Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Anthropic92.1%Max, Default Fallback · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
12GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AI91.1%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
13Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)Anthropic91.0%Max, Default Fallback · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
14GPT-6 Astra (Max)OpenAI90.6%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
15GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)OpenAI90.6%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
16Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Google90.5%High · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
17Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)Anthropic90.0%Max, Default Fallback · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
18Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Anthropic87.7%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
19GPT-6 Sol (Max)OpenAI86.9%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
20GPT-6 Luna (Max)OpenAI86.0%Max · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
21MiniMax-M3MiniMax85.6%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
22Inkling (Xhigh)Thinking Machines Lab81.3%Xhigh · StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
23Inkling SmallThinking Machines Lab77.6%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
24Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle64.5%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
25Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle54.7%StirrupOriginal resultNot reportedClosed

AA Harvey LAB v1.0

The live source now publishes v1.1 with a three-judge panel and hallucination gate. Earlier results remain on their original protocol and are not comparable with v1.1.

AA Harvey LAB v1.0; source configurations remain separate from the canonical benchmark table.
Source rankSource model or configurationScoreWho ran itSource setupParameters (B)Open / closed
1Kimi K3Moonshot AI94.6%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
2Claude Fable 5Anthropic93.6%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
3Claude Opus 5Anthropic93.5%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
4Step 5 PreviewStepFun93.4%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
5Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic93.1%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
6Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic93.0%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
7Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic91.2%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
No rank on this tableGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle90.7%Reported by GoogleArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
8Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic89.9%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed
9MiniMax M3MiniMax88.4%Independent run: Artificial AnalysisArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA81.7%Carried from an upstream pageArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedOpen
No rank on this tableGrok 4.7xAI19.6%Reported by xAIArtificial AnalysisOriginal resultNot reportedClosed

How to read this leaderboard

Operator receipt: 25 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is Muse Wonder Full (Max) at 13.1%.

Honest limit: Private tasks and model judges limit independent reproduction. Criterion pass and hallucination-gated all-pass rates measure different outcomes.

How to read Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Version 1.1 tests legal deliverables on 120 private tasks across 24 practice areas in the Stirrup agent harness. A three-judge panel grades each deliverable, and a separate check compares its claims with the source documents.

The headline hallucination-gated all-pass rate credits a task only when every rubric criterion passes and the deliverable contains no material hallucination, averaged across three judges. Criterion pass rate pools passed criteria across all three judges before the hallucination gate. The two metrics have separate tables.

Artificial Analysis developed v1.1 with Harvey and says its scores are not comparable with v1.0. We keep every published effort configuration and preserve the earlier table separately. These new results stay outside overall and category rankings.

Snapshot

25 configurations120 legal tasks24 practice areas3 judgesDisplay only

The published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 snapshot places Muse Wonder Full (Max) first at 13.1%. The third row is 3.6 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 8.9 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

25 models are shown for Harvey LAB-AA v1.1. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Year

2026

Tasks

120 private legal tasks across 24 practice areas

Format

Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Difficulty

Professional legal work

Stirrup agent harness on 120 private legal tasks across 24 practice areas. Version 1.1 changes the task set and grading; scores are not comparable with v1.0. Each effort and fallback setting remains a separate configuration. Results are display only.

Freshness and provenance

Version

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1

Refresh cadence

Published leaderboard snapshots

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Private legal tasks; only published aggregates mirrored

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 measure?

Legal-agent task success requiring every rubric criterion to pass and no material hallucination, averaged across three judges.

Which model leads the published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 snapshot?

Muse Wonder Full (Max) currently leads the published Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 snapshot with 13.1% hallucination-gated all-pass rate. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Harvey LAB-AA v1.1?

The 2026-11-12 capture snapshot contains 25 AI models.

Last updated: 2026-11-12 capture · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.