Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2025 (HMMT Feb 2025)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

A February 2025 HMMT slice used in exact-value provider tables for advanced contest-math reasoning.

Benchmark score on HMMT Feb 2025 — November 13, 2026

We compile the HMMT Feb 2025 rows from provider self-reports and secondary reports. GLM-5 leads the table at 97.5%, followed by GLM-4.7 (97.1%) and Qwen3.6 Plus (96.7%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

15 modelsMathematicsCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 13, 2026

Benchmark score table (15 models)

None of the 15 results on this page has a documented run by the benchmark or an independent evaluator: 13 reported by the labs that built the models and 2 reported in another publisher’s document.

Benchmark score results for HMMT Feb 2025
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1GLM-5Z.AIAnother lab’s comparison table
97.5%
Not reportedOpen
2GLM-4.7Z.AIReported by Z.AI
97.1%
Not reportedOpen
3Qwen3.6 PlusAlibabaReported by Alibaba
96.7%
Not reportedClosed
4Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Moonshot AIReported by Moonshot AI
95.4%
Not reportedOpen
5Kimi K2.5Moonshot AIReported by Moonshot AI
95.4%
Not reportedOpen
6Qwen3.5 397BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
94.8%
Not reportedOpen
7Qwen3.6-27BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
93.8%
Not reportedOpen
8Nemotron 3 Super 100BNVIDIAReported by NVIDIA
93.7%
Not reportedOpen
9Claude Opus 4.5AnthropicAnother lab’s comparison table
92.9%
Not reportedClosed
10Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
90.7%
Not reportedOpen
11Granite 4.2 30BIBMReported by IBM
89.2%
Not reportedOpen
12Sarvam 105BSarvamReported by Sarvam
85.8%
Not reportedOpen
13Granite 4.2 8BIBMReported by IBM
78.3%
Not reportedOpen
14Sarvam 30BSarvamReported by Sarvam
73.3%
Not reportedOpen
15Granite 4.2 3BIBMReported by IBM
66.7%
Not reportedOpen
  • Lab-reported
  • Benchmark-run
  • Independent
What the labels mean

Among the reported HMMT Feb 2025 rows, GLM-5 is first at 97.5%. The third row is 0.8 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 6.8 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

15 models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2025. The benchmark falls in the Mathematics category. HMMT Feb 2025 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About HMMT Feb 2025

Year

2025

Tasks

Competition math problems

Format

Contest mathematics

Difficulty

Olympiad-style mathematics

BenchLM stores this HMMT monthly slice separately from the aggregate HMMT rows so first-party exact values remain visible without overwriting the broader yearly HMMT reference.

Freshness and provenance

Version

HMMT Feb 2025 2025

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does HMMT Feb 2025 measure?

A February 2025 HMMT slice used in exact-value provider tables for advanced contest-math reasoning.

Which model scores highest on HMMT Feb 2025?

GLM-5 by Z.AI currently leads with a score of 97.5% on HMMT Feb 2025.

How many models are evaluated on HMMT Feb 2025?

15 AI models have published results on HMMT Feb 2025 in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: November 13, 2026 · BenchLM version HMMT Feb 2025 2025

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.