Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament February 2026 (HMMT Feb 2026)

Data verified

A February 2026 HMMT slice used in newer frontier-model math comparisons.

Top models on HMMT Feb 2026 — October 29, 2026

As of October 29, 2026, Qwen3.7 Max leads the HMMT Feb 2026 leaderboard with 97.1% , followed by DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (95.2%) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (94.8%).

29 modelsMathematics25% of category scoreCurrentUpdated October 29, 2026

Leaderboard (29 models)

HMMT Feb 2026 leaderboard
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba
97.1%
Not reportedClosed
2DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
95.2%
Not reportedOpen
3DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
94.8%
Not reportedOpen
4DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)DeepSeek
94.0%
Not reportedOpen
5Solar Open 2Upstage
93.9%
Not reportedOpen
6Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba
92.9%
Not reportedClosed
7Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
92.7%
Not reportedOpen
8GLM-5.2Z.AI
92.5%
Not reportedOpen
9DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)DeepSeek
91.9%
Not reportedOpen
10Inkling-SmallThinking Machines Lab
90.2%
Not reportedOpen
11Qwen3.5 397BAlibaba
87.9%
Not reportedOpen
12Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba
87.8%
Not reportedClosed
13Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
87.1%
Not reportedOpen
14Ling 3.0 FlashInclusionAI
87.0%
Not reportedOpen
15GLM-5Z.AI
86.4%
Not reportedOpen
16Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
85.3%
Not reportedClosed
17MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft
84.9%
Not reportedClosed
18Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba
84.3%
Not reportedOpen
19Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba
83.6%
Not reportedOpen
20GLM-5.1Z.AI
82.6%
Not reportedOpen
21Spark-X2.6-4BSparkLLM
81.3%
Not reportedOpen
22K-EXAONE 2.0LG AI Research
78.4%
Not reportedOpen
23MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
72.7%
Not reportedOpen
24ZAYA1-8BZyphra
71.6%
Not reportedOpen
25MiniCPM5-2BOpenBMB
63.8%
Not reportedOpen
26DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
40.8%
Not reportedOpen
27LongCat-Flash-Lite-SparseMeituan
40.5%
Not reportedOpen
28DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
31.7%
Not reportedOpen
29MiniCPM5-1BOpenBMB
25.8%
Not reportedOpen

According to BenchLM.ai, Qwen3.7 Max leads the HMMT Feb 2026 benchmark with a score of 97.1%, followed by DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (95.2%) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (94.8%). The top models are clustered within 2.3 points, suggesting this benchmark is nearing saturation for frontier models.

29 models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2026. The benchmark falls in the Mathematics category. The Mathematics leaderboard ranks models by a weighted category score, and HMMT Feb 2026 contributes 25% of it. BenchAlign v5.8 also uses it in the overall ranking.

About HMMT Feb 2026

Year

2026

Tasks

Competition math problems

Format

Contest mathematics

Difficulty

Olympiad-style mathematics

HMMT February 2026 matters because small score deltas at the frontier often depend on which contest set is used. BenchLM keeps this newer slice distinct from older HMMT summary rows.

Freshness and provenance

Version

HMMT Feb 2026 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

Current

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does HMMT Feb 2026 measure?

A February 2026 HMMT slice used in newer frontier-model math comparisons.

Which model scores highest on HMMT Feb 2026?

Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba currently leads with a score of 97.1% on HMMT Feb 2026.

How many models are evaluated on HMMT Feb 2026?

29 AI models have published results on HMMT Feb 2026 in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: October 29, 2026 · BenchLM version HMMT Feb 2026 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.