Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

RefCOCO average (RefCOCO (avg))

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

A referring-expression grounding benchmark averaged across RefCOCO variants to test whether a model can localize described objects correctly.

Benchmark score on RefCOCO (avg) — November 13, 2026

We compile the RefCOCO (avg) rows from provider self-reports and secondary reports. Qwen3.6-27B leads the table at 92.5%, followed by Qwen3.5 397B (92.3%) and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (92.0%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

10 modelsMultimodal & GroundedCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 13, 2026

Benchmark score table (10 models)

None of the 10 results on this page has a documented run by the benchmark or an independent evaluator: 8 reported by the labs that built the models and 2 reported in another publisher’s document.

Benchmark score results for RefCOCO (avg)
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Qwen3.6-27BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
92.5%
Not reportedOpen
2Qwen3.5 397BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
92.3%
Not reportedOpen
3Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibabaReported by Alibaba
92.0%
Not reportedOpen
4Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNVIDIAReported by NVIDIA
90.5%
Not reportedOpen
5LFM3-VL-2BLiquidAIReported by LiquidAI
90.5%
Not reportedOpen
6LFM2.5-VL-3BLiquidAIReported by LiquidAI
87.9%
Not reportedOpen
7Kimi K2.5Moonshot AIAnother lab’s comparison table
87.8%
Not reportedOpen
8ZAYA1-VL-8BZyphraReported by Zyphra
84.3%
Not reportedOpen
9Gemini 3 ProGoogleAnother lab’s comparison table
84.1%
Not reportedClosed
10Interfaze BetaInterfazeReported by Interfaze
82.1%
Not reportedClosed
  • Lab-reported
  • Benchmark-run
  • Independent
What the labels mean

Among the reported RefCOCO (avg) rows, Qwen3.6-27B is first at 92.5%. The third row is 0.5 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 10.4 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

10 models have been evaluated on RefCOCO (avg). The benchmark falls in the Multimodal & Grounded category. RefCOCO (avg) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About RefCOCO (avg)

Year

2026

Tasks

Referring-expression grounding

Format

Grounded visual localization

Difficulty

Fine-grained visual grounding

RefCOCO-style tasks matter for grounding-heavy assistants because they measure whether the model can map language to specific objects or regions instead of only answering abstract questions. BenchLM stores provider-reported aggregate RefCOCO values as a display-only grounding row.

Freshness and provenance

Version

RefCOCO (avg) 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does RefCOCO (avg) measure?

A referring-expression grounding benchmark averaged across RefCOCO variants to test whether a model can localize described objects correctly.

Which model scores highest on RefCOCO (avg)?

Qwen3.6-27B by Alibaba currently leads with a score of 92.5% on RefCOCO (avg).

How many models are evaluated on RefCOCO (avg)?

10 AI models have published results on RefCOCO (avg) in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: November 13, 2026 · BenchLM version RefCOCO (avg) 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.