Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament November 2025 (HMMT Nov 2025)
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
A November 2025 HMMT slice for high-end mathematical reasoning comparisons.
Benchmark score on HMMT Nov 2025 — November 13, 2026
We compile the HMMT Nov 2025 rows from provider self-reports and secondary reports. GLM-5 leads the table at 96.9%, followed by Qwen3.6 Plus (94.6%) and GLM-5.2 (94.4%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
GLM-5
Z.AI
Another lab’s comparison tableQwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
Reported by AlibabaGLM-5.2
Z.AI
Reported by Z.AI12 modelsMathematicsCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 13, 2026
Benchmark score table (12 models)
None of the 12 results on this page has a documented run by the benchmark or an independent evaluator: 9 reported by the labs that built the models and 3 reported in another publisher’s document.
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Who ran it | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GLM-5Z.AIAnother lab’s comparison table | 96.9% | Another lab’s comparison table | Not reported | Open |
| 2 | Qwen3.6 PlusAlibabaReported by Alibaba | 94.6% | Reported by Alibaba | Not reported | Closed |
| 3 | GLM-5.2Z.AIReported by Z.AI | 94.4% | Reported by Z.AI | Not reported | Open |
| 4 | GLM-5.1Z.AIReported by Z.AI | 94.0% | Reported by Z.AI | Not reported | Open |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5AnthropicAnother lab’s comparison table | 93.3% | Another lab’s comparison table | Not reported | Closed |
| 6 | Qwen3.5 397BAlibabaReported by Alibaba | 92.7% | Reported by Alibaba | Not reported | Open |
| 7 | Kimi K2.5Moonshot AIReported by Moonshot AI | 91.1% | Reported by Moonshot AI | Not reported | Open |
| 8 | Qwen3.6-27BAlibabaReported by Alibaba | 90.7% | Reported by Alibaba | Not reported | Open |
| 9 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibabaReported by Alibaba | 89.1% | Reported by Alibaba | Not reported | Open |
| 10 | Sarvam 105BSarvamReported by Sarvam | 85.8% | Reported by Sarvam | Not reported | Open |
| 11 | MiniMax M2.7MiniMaxAnother lab’s comparison table | 81.0% | Another lab’s comparison table | Not reported | Open |
| 12 | Sarvam 30BSarvamReported by Sarvam | 74.2% | Reported by Sarvam | Not reported | Open |
- Lab-reported
- Benchmark-run
- Independent
Among the reported HMMT Nov 2025 rows, GLM-5 is first at 96.9%. The third row is 2.5 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 11.1 points, so the table still separates the published systems.
12 models have been evaluated on HMMT Nov 2025. The benchmark falls in the Mathematics category. HMMT Nov 2025 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About HMMT Nov 2025
Year
2025
Tasks
Competition math problems
Format
Contest mathematics
Difficulty
Olympiad-style mathematics
This row preserves exact provider-table values from the late-2025 HMMT contest cycle. It is useful for spotting whether frontier models generalize across separate contest sets rather than a single annual rollup.
Freshness and provenance
Version
HMMT Nov 2025 2025
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does HMMT Nov 2025 measure?
A November 2025 HMMT slice for high-end mathematical reasoning comparisons.
Which model scores highest on HMMT Nov 2025?
GLM-5 by Z.AI currently leads with a score of 96.9% on HMMT Nov 2025.
How many models are evaluated on HMMT Nov 2025?
12 AI models have published results on HMMT Nov 2025 in the BenchLM catalog.
Compare top models on HMMT Nov 2025
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 7,000+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.