Skip to main content
BenchLM

InferenceBench

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified 34 confirmed releases in the last 30 daysFollow model changes

A benchmark for open-ended LLM inference optimization by AI agents. Agents receive a base model, one H100, and a fixed time budget to build a valid OpenAI-compatible inference server that improves serving speed.

Aggregate speedup on InferenceBench — May 20, 2026

We mirror the published aggregate speedup view for InferenceBench. Claude Fable 5.1 leads the public snapshot at 9.83x, followed by Claude Fable 5.1 (9.31x) and Claude Opus 5 (8.90x). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

39 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated May 20, 2026

Aggregate speedup table (39 models)

Score
1
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.258 · strict prompt
9.83x
2
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.258 · strict prompt
9.31x
3
Claude Opus 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.119 · strict prompt
8.90x
4
Claude Fable 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175 · strict prompt
8.74x
5
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175
8.53x
6
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI · strict prompt
7.90x
7
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175
7.60x
8
Claude Fable 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175 · strict prompt
7.52x
9
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI · strict prompt
7.34x
10
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
7.34x
11
GLM-5.2Z.AI · Open weightClaude Code · v2.1.119 · strict prompt
7.00x
12
Grok 4.6xAI · ClosedGrok Build · strict prompt
6.65x
13
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.119 · strict prompt
6.43x
14
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · Open weightOpenCode · strict prompt
6.27x
15
GPT-5.4OpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
6.16x
16
Kimi K3Moonshot AI · ClosedOpenCode · strict prompt
5.70x
17
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
5.56x
18
GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
5.53x
19
GPT-5.5OpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
5.45x
20
GLM-5.3Z.AI · Open weightClaude Code · v2.1.119 · strict prompt
4.98x
21
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle · ClosedOpenCode
4.92x
22
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · Open weightOpenCode
4.51x
23
GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AI · Open weightOpenCode · strict prompt
4.49x
24
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
4.38x
25
GPT-5.2OpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
4.28x
26
GPT-5.5OpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
4.22x
27
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle · ClosedOpenCode
4.16x
28
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
3.76x
29
Grok 4.5xAI · ClosedGrok Build · strict prompt
3.70x
30
GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
3.59x
31
Grok 4.5xAI · ClosedOpenCode · strict prompt
3.42x
32
GLM-5Z.AI · Open weightOpenCode
3.22x
33
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
3.18x
34
Claude Fable 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175
3.16x
35
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code
2.78x
36
GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
2.32x
37
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.114
2.25x
38
Claude Fable 5Anthropic · ClosedClaude Code · v2.1.175
2.15x
39
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI · ClosedCodex CLI
1.98x

How InferenceBench is shown here

BenchLM mirrors the public InferenceBench agent leaderboard captured on May 20, 2026. The source evaluates 39 frontier agent configurations over 4 inference-serving scenarios with a 2 h budget on 1 NVIDIA H100 80 GB.

InferenceBench is display only on BenchLM. It is a useful agentic systems-engineering signal, but the rows combine model capability, agent scaffold, inference framework choices, hardware, and final-server validity, so BenchLM keeps it separate from weighted model-only rankings.

Snapshot

39 agent rows4 scenarios180 runs2 hDisplay only

The published InferenceBench snapshot places Claude Fable 5.1 first at 9.83x. The third row is 0.93 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 2.49 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

39 models have been evaluated on InferenceBench. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. InferenceBench is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About InferenceBench

Year

2026

Tasks

4 inference-serving optimization scenarios

Format

Two-hour autonomous CLI agent run

Difficulty

Open-ended ML systems engineering

BenchLM mirrors the public InferenceBench agent leaderboard as a display-only agentic systems-engineering benchmark. The primary score is aggregate geometric-mean speedup over a PyTorch baseline across prefill latency, decode latency, throughput, and all-in-one serving scenarios.

Freshness and provenance

Version

InferenceBench 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark harness and aggregate leaderboard

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does InferenceBench measure?

A benchmark for open-ended LLM inference optimization by AI agents. Agents receive a base model, one H100, and a fixed time budget to build a valid OpenAI-compatible inference server that improves serving speed.

Which model leads the published InferenceBench snapshot?

Claude Fable 5.1 currently leads the published InferenceBench snapshot with 9.83x aggregate speedup. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on InferenceBench?

The May 20, 2026 snapshot contains 39 AI models.

Last updated: May 20, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.