Vals MedQA (MedQA)
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Evaluating language model bias in medical questions.
Evaluation results published by Vals AI. Published leaderboard aggregates and evaluation settings only. Dataset contents are not included.
MedQA score on MedQA — April 16, 2026
We mirror the published medqa score view for MedQA. o1 leads the public snapshot at 96.52%, followed by GPT-5.1 (96.38%) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (96.37%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
o1
OpenAI
high reasoning
GPT-5.1
OpenAI
high reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
high reasoning
95 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated April 16, 2026
MedQA score table (95 models)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o1OpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.52% | Not reported | Closed |
| 2 | GPT-5.1OpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.38% | Not reported | Closed |
| 3 | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGooglehigh reasoning | 96.37% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | GPT-5OpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.32% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 5 | GPT-5.4OpenAIxhigh reasoning | 96.09% | Not reported | Closed |
| 6 | o3OpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.06% | Not reported | Closed |
| 7 | GPT-5 miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.06% | Not reported | Closed |
| 8 | Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGooglehigh reasoning | 96.03% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | o4-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 96.02% | Not reported | Closed |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 95.88% | Not reported | Closed |
| 11 | Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGooglehigh reasoning | 95.81% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Anthropic | 95.41% | Not reported | Closed |
| 13 | Qwen3.5 Plus ThinkingAlibaba | 95.21% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 14 | o3-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 94.83% | Not reported | Closed |
| 15 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 94.71% | Not reported | Closed |
| 16 | Grok 4.20 0309 ReasoningxAI | 94.55% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 17 | Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AI | 94.37% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 18 | GLM 5 ThinkingZhipu AI | 94.27% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 19 | GPT-5.2OpenAIxhigh reasoning | 94.13% | Not reported | Closed |
| 20 | DeepSeek V3p2 ThinkingFireworks AIhigh reasoning | 93.92% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 21 | GLM-4.7Z.AI | 93.74% | Not reported | Open |
| 22 | Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 ThinkingAnthropic | 93.59% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | GPT-5 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning | 93.26% | Not reported | Closed |
| 24 | Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | 93.16% | Not reported | Closed |
| 25 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Exp 03 25Google | 93.14% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 26 | o1-previewOpenAIhigh reasoning | 93.01% | Not reported | Closed |
| 27 | Claude Opus 4Anthropic | 92.87% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 28 | Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 ThinkingAnthropic | 92.71% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 29 | Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI | 92.59% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 30 | Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic | 92.53% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 31 | MiniMax M2.5MiniMax | 92.53% | Not reported | Closed |
| 32 | Grok 4 0709xAI | 92.49% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 33 | Grok 2 1212xAI | 92.32% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 34 | GLM-4.6Z.AI | 92.22% | Not reported | Open |
| 35 | Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAI | 92.08% | Not reported | Closed |
| 36 | Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAI | 92.07% | Not reported | Closed |
| 37 | Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic | 92.06% | Not reported | Closed |
| 38 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025Google | 91.43% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 39 | GPT-OSS 120BOpenAI | 91.36% | Not reported | Open |
| 40 | GPT-4.1OpenAIhigh reasoning | 91.18% | Not reported | Closed |
| 41 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle | 91.17% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 42 | MiniMax M2.1MiniMax | 91.16% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 43 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 04 17 ThinkingGoogle | 91.02% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 44 | DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | 90.80% | Not reported | Open |
| 45 | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba | 90.62% | Not reported | Open |
| 46 | Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic | 90.35% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 47 | o1-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 90.22% | Not reported | Closed |
| 48 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet ThinkingAnthropic | 90.22% | Not reported | Closed |
| 49 | Grok 3 Mini Fast High ReasoningxAIhigh reasoning | 90.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 50 | GLM-4.5Z.AI | 89.97% | Not reported | Closed |
| 51 | Magistral Medium 2509Mistral AI | 89.47% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 52 | DeepSeek V3p2Fireworks AInone reasoning | 89.45% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 53 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle | 88.87% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 54 | Grok 3 Mini Fast Low ReasoningxAIlow reasoning | 88.65% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 55 | Meta Llama Meta Llama 3.1 405B Instruct TurboTogether AI | 88.24% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 56 | GPT-4oOpenAIhigh reasoning | 88.16% | Not reported | Closed |
| 57 | Qwen3 Max PreviewAlibaba | 87.38% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 58 | Qwen3 MaxAlibaba | 87.37% | Not reported | Closed |
| 59 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 04 17Google | 86.73% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 60 | Meta Llama Meta Llama 3.1 70B Instruct TurboTogether AI | 84.78% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 61 | GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 84.63% | Not reported | Closed |
| 62 | Moonshotai Kimi K2 InstructTogether AI | 83.97% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 63 | Grok 3xAI | 83.85% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 64 | Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic | 83.19% | Not reported | Closed |
| 65 | GPT-OSS 20BOpenAI | 82.88% | Not reported | Open |
| 66 | Magistral Small 2509Mistral AI | 82.36% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 67 | Mistral Large 2512Mistral AI | 82.23% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 68 | DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek | 82.00% | Not reported | Open |
| 69 | GPT-4 TurboOpenAIhigh reasoning | 81.99% | Not reported | Closed |
| 70 | Gemini 2.0 Flash 001Google | 81.47% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 71 | DeepSeek V3DeepSeek | 80.90% | Not reported | Open |
| 72 | Command A 03 2025Cohere | 80.55% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 73 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025Google | 80.33% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 74 | Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 79.57% | Not reported | Closed |
| 75 | Mistral Medium 2505Mistral AI | 78.23% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 76 | Qwen Qwen2.5 72B Instruct TurboTogether AI | 77.39% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 77 | Gemini 1.5 Pro 002Google | 76.53% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 78 | Mistral Large 2411Mistral AI | 76.22% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 79 | Grok 4.1 Fast Non ReasoningxAI | 76.03% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 80 | Grok 4 Fast Non ReasoningxAI | 75.36% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 81 | GPT-4o miniOpenAIhigh reasoning | 72.44% | Not reported | Closed |
| 82 | Mistral Small 2503Mistral AI | 69.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 83 | GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning | 68.22% | Not reported | Closed |
| 84 | Jamba 1.5 LargeAI21 Labs | 68.11% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 85 | Meta Llama Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct TurboTogether AI | 62.61% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 86 | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Mistral | 62.14% | Not reported | Open |
| 87 | GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAIhigh reasoning | 58.47% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 88 | Mistral Small 2402Mistral AI | 56.98% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 89 | Jamba 1.5 MiniAI21 Labs | 55.18% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 90 | Mistralai Mixtral 8x7B V0.1Together AI | 53.22% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 91 | Jamba Mini 1.6AI21 Labs | 52.52% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 92 | Meta Llama Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructTogether AI | 50.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 93 | Jamba Large 1.6AI21 Labs | 50.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 94 | Llama4 Maverick Instruct BasicFireworks AI | 43.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 95 | Command R PlusCohere | 2.65% | Not reported | Unknown |
How MedQA is shown here
BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI MedQA leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/medqa and updated by Vals on April 16, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.
MedQA is display only on BenchLM. Vals proprietary or Vals-hosted aggregate views are useful context, but BenchLM does not use them as weighted ranking inputs or as a replacement for benchmark-native source records.
Snapshot
The published MedQA snapshot places o1 first at 96.52%. The third row is 0.15 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 0.64 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.
95 models have been evaluated on MedQA. The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. MedQA is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About MedQA
Year
2026
Tasks
Medical question answering
Format
Accuracy score
Difficulty
Medical knowledge and bias evaluation
BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI MedQA leaderboard as display-only external evidence. The captured snapshot preserves overall scores, task-level scores where Vals publishes them, uncertainty, latency, and cost-per-test metadata. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted rankings.
Freshness and provenance
Version
MedQA 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does MedQA measure?
Evaluating language model bias in medical questions.
Which model leads the published MedQA snapshot?
o1 currently leads the published MedQA snapshot with 96.52% medqa score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on MedQA?
The April 16, 2026 snapshot contains 95 AI models.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 7,000+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.