Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

LiveCodeBench, Vals AI run (LiveCodeBench (Vals))

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Vals AI’s independent implementation of the LiveCodeBench code-generation benchmark, run under one fixed harness across the models it tracks.

Evaluation results published by Vals AI. Published leaderboard aggregates and evaluation settings only. Dataset contents are not included.

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror score on LiveCodeBench (Vals) — September 1, 2026

We mirror the published vals livecodebench mirror score view for LiveCodeBench (Vals). Claude Fable 5.1 leads the public snapshot at 90.5%, followed by Claude Fable 5 (89.8%) and Gemini 3.8 Flash (89.5%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

143 modelsCoding8% of Coding reference weightCurrentUpdated September 1, 2026

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror score table (143 models)

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror score results for LiveCodeBench (Vals)
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
90.5%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Fable 5Anthropic
89.8%
Not reportedClosed
3Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
89.5%
Not reportedClosed
4Claude Opus 5Anthropic
89.0%
Not reportedClosed
5Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
88.7%
Not reportedClosed
6Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
88.5%
Not reportedUnknown
7Grok 4.6xAIhigh reasoning
88.2%
Not reportedClosed
8Gemini 3.6 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
88.1%
Not reportedClosed
9GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI
88.0%
Not reportedClosed
10Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
87.9%
Not reportedOpen
11Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
87.8%
Not reportedClosed
12Gemini 3.5 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
87.6%
Not reportedClosed
13DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekmax reasoning
87.5%
Not reportedOpen
14DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekmax reasoning
87.5%
Not reportedOpen
15Grok 4.5xAIhigh reasoning
87.4%
Not reportedClosed
16GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIxhigh reasoning
87.3%
Not reportedClosed
17DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeekhigh reasoning
87.3%
Not reportedOpen
18Kimi K3Moonshot AImax reasoning
87.2%
Not reportedOpen
19Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba
87.1%
Not reportedClosed
20Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
86.8%
Not reportedOpen
21GPT-5 miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
86.6%
Not reportedClosed
22GPT-5.1OpenAIhigh reasoning
86.5%
Not reportedClosed
23Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle
86.4%
Not reportedUnknown
24Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55bNvidia
86.0%
Not reportedUnknown
25Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba
86.0%
Not reportedClosed
26Inkling-SmallThinking Machines Lab0.99 reasoning
85.9%
Not reportedOpen
27GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIxhigh reasoning
85.9%
Not reportedClosed
28GPT-5OpenAIhigh reasoning
85.9%
Not reportedUnknown
29Muse Spark 1.1Metaxhigh reasoning
85.9%
Not reportedClosed
30Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
85.6%
Not reportedUnknown
31GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
85.5%
Not reportedClosed
32InklingThinking Machines Lab0.99 reasoning
85.5%
Not reportedOpen
33GPT-5.2OpenAIxhigh reasoning
85.4%
Not reportedClosed
34Qwen3.5 Plus ThinkingAlibaba
85.3%
Not reportedUnknown
35GPT-5.5OpenAIxhigh reasoning
85.3%
Not reportedClosed
36Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
85.1%
Not reportedClosed
37GPT-5 CodexOpenAIhigh reasoning
84.7%
Not reportedUnknown
38Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Anthropic
84.7%
Not reportedClosed
39Grok 4.3xAIhigh reasoning
84.5%
Not reportedClosed
40Grok 4.20 0309 ReasoningxAI
84.3%
Not reportedUnknown
41GPT-5.4OpenAIxhigh reasoning
84.1%
Not reportedClosed
42GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning
84.0%
Not reportedClosed
43Qwen3.8-27BAlibabaxhigh reasoning
84.0%
Not reportedOpen
44Ling 3.0 Flash 2607Ant
84.0%
Not reportedUnknown
45o3OpenAIhigh reasoning
83.9%
Not reportedClosed
46Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AI
83.9%
Not reportedUnknown
47Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
83.7%
Not reportedClosed
48GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAIhigh reasoning
83.6%
Not reportedClosed
49Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba
83.3%
Not reportedClosed
50Grok 4 0709xAI
83.2%
Not reportedUnknown
51GPT-OSS 120BOpenAI
83.2%
Not reportedOpen
52GPT-5.6 SolOpenAImax reasoning
82.6%
Not reportedClosed
53Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
82.4%
Not reportedClosed
54GLM-4.7Z.AI
82.2%
Not reportedOpen
55o4-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
82.2%
Not reportedClosed
56MiniMax M3MiniMax
82.2%
Not reportedOpen
57Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
82.1%
Not reportedClosed
58Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
82.0%
Not reportedOpen
59GLM 5 ThinkingZhipu AI
81.9%
Not reportedUnknown
60MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
81.8%
Not reportedUnknown
61MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
81.5%
Not reportedClosed
62GPT-5.4 miniOpenAIxhigh reasoning
81.5%
Not reportedClosed
63GLM-5.1Z.AI
81.4%
Not reportedOpen
64MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
81.4%
Not reportedClosed
65GLM-4.6Z.AI
81.0%
Not reportedOpen
66DeepSeek V3p2 ThinkingFireworks AI
80.7%
Not reportedUnknown
67Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAI
80.6%
Not reportedClosed
68GLM-5.3Z.AImax reasoning
80.5%
Not reportedOpen
69GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AImax reasoning
80.5%
Not reportedOpen
70GPT-OSS 20BOpenAI
80.4%
Not reportedOpen
71Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle
80.1%
Not reportedUnknown
72MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
79.9%
Not reportedOpen
73MiniMax M2.5MiniMax
79.2%
Not reportedClosed
74Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 03 25Google
79.2%
Not reportedUnknown
75Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGooglehigh reasoning
79.0%
Not reportedClosed
76Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAI
79.0%
Not reportedClosed
77Qwen3 MaxAlibaba
78.2%
Not reportedClosed
78Grok 3 Mini Fast High ReasoningxAIhigh reasoning
76.2%
Not reportedUnknown
79Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle
76.2%
Not reportedUnknown
80Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025Google
75.1%
Not reportedUnknown
81Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
75.0%
Not reportedClosed
82Magistral Medium 2509Mistral AI
74.9%
Not reportedUnknown
83Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
73.0%
Not reportedClosed
84Magistral Small 2509Mistral AI
72.1%
Not reportedUnknown
85o3-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
71.5%
Not reportedClosed
86Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle
71.4%
Not reportedUnknown
87Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba
70.6%
Not reportedOpen
88Moonshotai Kimi K2 InstructTogether AI
70.4%
Not reportedUnknown
89DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek
70.2%
Not reportedOpen
90GPT-5 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning
70.2%
Not reportedClosed
91Claude Opus 4 20250514 ThinkingAnthropic
70.2%
Not reportedUnknown
92DeepSeek V3p2Fireworks AI
69.9%
Not reportedUnknown
93GLM-5.2Z.AI
69.5%
Not reportedOpen
94Laguna M.1Poolside
68.1%
Not reportedClosed
95Laguna XS.2Poolside
67.8%
Not reportedOpen
96Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025Google
67.7%
Not reportedUnknown
97GLM-4.5Z.AI
67.4%
Not reportedClosed
98Qwen3 Max PreviewAlibaba
66.9%
Not reportedUnknown
99Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 ThinkingAnthropic
66.5%
Not reportedUnknown
100Grok 3 Mini Fast Low ReasoningxAIlow reasoning
66.3%
Not reportedUnknown
101DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek
65.5%
Not reportedOpen
102Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
64.6%
Not reportedUnknown
103Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
63.1%
Not reportedUnknown
104Claude Opus 4Anthropic
62.6%
Not reportedUnknown
105Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 ThinkingAnthropic
62.4%
Not reportedUnknown
106Grok Code Fast 1xAI
62.0%
Not reportedClosed
107Claude 3.7 Sonnet ThinkingAnthropic
60.4%
Not reportedClosed
108Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic
59.7%
Not reportedUnknown
109Langston Nim Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1 42e84561 ThinkingTogether AI
58.4%
Not reportedUnknown
110GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
58.2%
Not reportedClosed
111Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 04 17Google
56.9%
Not reportedUnknown
112Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic
56.7%
Not reportedClosed
113Mistral Large 2512Mistral AI
55.3%
Not reportedUnknown
114GPT-4.1OpenAIhigh reasoning
54.7%
Not reportedClosed
115Grok 3xAI
52.9%
Not reportedUnknown
116Devstral 2512Mistral AI
51.8%
Not reportedUnknown
117o1OpenAIhigh reasoning
50.3%
Not reportedClosed
118Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic
49.6%
Not reportedClosed
119Llama4 Maverick Instruct BasicFireworks AI
47.3%
Not reportedUnknown
120Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 04 17 ThinkingGoogle
46.9%
Not reportedUnknown
121Grok 4 Fast Non ReasoningxAI
46.1%
Not reportedUnknown
122Mistral Medium 2505Mistral AI
44.8%
Not reportedUnknown
123Gemini 2.0 Flash 001Google
43.6%
Not reportedUnknown
124GPT-4oOpenAIhigh reasoning
43.4%
Not reportedClosed
125Labs Devstral Small 2512Mistral AI
43.2%
Not reportedUnknown
126GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning
42.7%
Not reportedClosed
127Grok 4.1 Fast Non ReasoningxAI
42.6%
Not reportedUnknown
128Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic
41.9%
Not reportedClosed
129Gemini 1.5 Pro 002Google
41.7%
Not reportedUnknown
130Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
41.2%
Not reportedClosed
131Grok 2 1212xAI
38.7%
Not reportedUnknown
132Meta Llama Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructTogether AI
38.5%
Not reportedUnknown
133Mistral Large 2411Mistral AI
37.1%
Not reportedUnknown
134Gemini 1.5 Flash 002Google
36.9%
Not reportedUnknown
135Meta Llama Llama 3.3 70B Instruct TurboTogether AI
36.3%
Not reportedUnknown
136Langston Nim Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b V1 42e84561Together AI
36.3%
Not reportedUnknown
137Command A 03 2025Cohere
35.1%
Not reportedUnknown
138Mistral Small 2503Mistral AI
31.8%
Not reportedUnknown
139GPT-4o miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
26.4%
Not reportedClosed
140Jamba Large 1.6AI21 Labs
22.3%
Not reportedUnknown
141Command R PlusCohere
18.2%
Not reportedUnknown
142Mistral Small 2402Mistral AI
15.8%
Not reportedUnknown
143Jamba Mini 1.6AI21 Labs
9.9%
Not reportedUnknown

How Vals LiveCodeBench mirror is shown here

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI Vals LiveCodeBench mirror leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/lcb and updated by Vals on September 1, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.

Each row keeps the harness and settings the source published. BenchLM shows the published table for reference; the per-model scores it stores feed the ranking.

Snapshot

143 Vals rows4 task viewspublic datasetTasks: Overall, Easy, Medium, HardScored

The published LiveCodeBench (Vals) snapshot places Claude Fable 5.1 first at 90.5%. The third row is 1.0 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 2.7 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

143 models have been evaluated on LiveCodeBench (Vals). The benchmark falls in the Coding category. BenchLM shows the published table for reference; the per-model scores it stores feed the ranking. BenchAlign v5.8 gives LiveCodeBench (Vals) 8% of the Coding reference weight, so it moves the Coding leaderboard and the overall ranking. Reference weights are relative weights in the calibrated model, not fixed shares of a score.

About LiveCodeBench (Vals)

Year

2026

Tasks

Competitive programming problems (easy, medium, hard)

Format

Pass@1 accuracy

Difficulty

Frontier coding

BenchLM mirrors the Vals AI board on a dedicated key so a provider-run row on the canonical key is never overwritten. Vals publishes per-task accuracy with standard error, latency, and cost for every model it runs. Admitted as independent third-party evidence in methodology v5.5 (2026-09-04).

Freshness and provenance

Version

LiveCodeBench (Vals) 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

Current

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does LiveCodeBench (Vals) measure?

Vals AI’s independent implementation of the LiveCodeBench code-generation benchmark, run under one fixed harness across the models it tracks.

Which model leads the published LiveCodeBench (Vals) snapshot?

Claude Fable 5.1 currently leads the published LiveCodeBench (Vals) snapshot with 90.5% vals livecodebench mirror score. BenchLM shows the published table for reference; the per-model scores it stores feed the ranking.

How many models are evaluated on LiveCodeBench (Vals)?

The September 1, 2026 snapshot contains 143 AI models.

Last updated: September 1, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.