Skip to main content

Benchmark profile

Vals-hosted LiveCodeBench mirror (Vals LiveCodeBench mirror)

Vals AI implementation of LiveCodeBench with easy, medium, and hard task splits.

Data verified

How BenchLM shows Vals LiveCodeBench mirror

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI Vals LiveCodeBench mirror leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/lcb and updated by Vals on July 23, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror is display only on BenchLM. Vals proprietary or Vals-hosted aggregate views are useful context, but BenchLM does not use them as weighted ranking inputs or as a replacement for benchmark-native source records.

131 Vals rows4 task viewspublic datasetTasks: Overall, Easy, Medium, HardDisplay only

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror score on Vals LiveCodeBench mirror — July 23, 2026

BenchLM mirrors the published vals livecodebench mirror score view for Vals LiveCodeBench mirror. Claude Fable 5 leads the public snapshot at 89.78% , followed by Claude Opus 5 (89.03%) and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (88.48%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.

131 modelsExternal benchmark mirrorsCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated July 23, 2026

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror score table (131 models)

Score
1
89.78%
2
Claude Opus 5Anthropic
89.03%
4
88.08%
5
87.99%
6
87.82%
7
87.60%
8
87.48%
9
87.35%
10
87.31%
11
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
87.19%
12
87.06%
13
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
86.77%
14
86.61%
15
GPT-5.1OpenAI
86.49%
16
86.41%
18
85.95%
19
85.93%
20
GPT-5OpenAI
85.91%
21
85.91%
23
85.55%
24
InklingThinkingmachines
85.52%
25
GPT-5.2OpenAI
85.36%
26
85.33%
27
GPT-5.5OpenAI
85.30%
28
85.07%
29
84.72%
30
84.68%
31
84.49%
33
GPT-5.4OpenAI
84.14%
34
84.01%
35
O3OpenAI
83.91%
36
83.87%
38
83.56%
39
83.28%
40
83.25%
41
GPT Oss 120bFireworks AI
83.23%
42
82.60%
43
82.43%
44
GLM 4.7Zhipu AI
82.23%
45
O4 MiniOpenAI
82.21%
46
MiniMax M3MiniMax
82.15%
47
82.09%
48
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
82.05%
49
81.87%
50
81.76%
51
Mimo V2.5Xiaomi
81.51%
52
81.47%
53
GLM 5.1Zhipu AI
81.38%
54
81.35%
55
GLM 4.6Zhipu AI
81.04%
56
80.69%
58
GPT Oss 20bFireworks AI
80.39%
60
79.93%
61
79.21%
63
79.01%
65
Qwen3 MaxAlibaba
78.22%
69
75.03%
70
74.86%
72
72.13%
73
O3 MiniOpenAI
71.48%
75
Qwen3 235b A22bFireworks AI
70.62%
76
70.45%
77
DeepSeek R1Fireworks AI
70.22%
78
70.22%
80
DeepSeek V3p2Fireworks AI
69.86%
81
GLM 5.2Zhipu AI
69.50%
83
GLM 4.5Zhipu AI
67.45%
84
66.91%
85
Laguna Xs.2Poolside
66.61%
88
DeepSeek V3 0324Fireworks AI
65.48%
89
64.56%
90
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
63.15%
91
Claude Opus 4Anthropic
62.63%
93
61.97%
94
Laguna M.1Poolside
61.44%
96
59.67%
98
58.16%
100
56.66%
101
55.34%
102
GPT-4.1OpenAI
54.67%
103
52.90%
104
Devstral 2512Mistral AI
51.84%
105
O1OpenAI
50.26%
106
49.63%
107
47.25%
110
44.84%
111
43.61%
112
GPT-4oOpenAI
43.44%
113
43.18%
114
42.72%
116
41.92%
117
41.72%
119
38.68%
121
37.09%
122
36.91%
125
35.07%
126
31.82%
127
26.42%
128
22.32%
129
18.24%
130
15.78%
131
9.92%

The published Vals LiveCodeBench mirror snapshot places Claude Fable 5 first at 89.78%. The third row is 1.29 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 2.47 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

131 models have been evaluated on Vals LiveCodeBench mirror. The benchmark falls in the External benchmark mirrors category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Vals LiveCodeBench mirror is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Vals LiveCodeBench mirror

Year

2026

Tasks

Coding problem difficulty splits

Format

Accuracy score

Difficulty

Contamination-resistant coding problems

BenchLM keeps this separate from its canonical LiveCodeBench rows because it is a Vals-hosted implementation snapshot.

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

Vals LiveCodeBench mirror 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

FAQ

What does Vals LiveCodeBench mirror measure?

Vals AI implementation of LiveCodeBench with easy, medium, and hard task splits.

Which model leads the published Vals LiveCodeBench mirror snapshot?

Claude Fable 5 currently leads the published Vals LiveCodeBench mirror snapshot with 89.78% vals livecodebench mirror score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Vals LiveCodeBench mirror?

131 AI models are included in BenchLM's mirrored Vals LiveCodeBench mirror snapshot, based on the public leaderboard captured on July 23, 2026.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.