Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of November 13, 2026 · How the score is built

Gemini 2.5 Flash

EstablishedProprietaryNon-Reasoning

Decision readingGemini 2.5 Flash scores 41.8 out of 100 and ranks #130 of 215. This profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #113. API pricing is $0.3 input and $2.5 output per million tokens, with cached input at $0.03.

Email me when its price, rank or availability changes.

Capability

41.8/100

field median 49.4#130 of 215 ranked models

Public

#130of 215

Verified #65 of 81

Price

$0.30input / $2.50 output

input median $0.60cached $0.030 · batch + cache $0.030 · blended $1.40

Speed

206tok/s

field median 92 tok/sFirst token 0.48 s

Context

1Mtokens

field median 256,000Maximum output length is tracked separately

Decision snapshot

Where this model sits in the ranked field, its strongest published evidence, and what to validate before choosing it. The marker compares it with the current ranked catalog, not with an absolute quality threshold.

Strongest published evidence

Instruction Following ranks #113. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Validate before choosing

2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Knowledge is its lowest eligible category at #132.

Source-linked · 2 displayable benchmark rows

Gemini 2.5 Flash API pricing

Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens on the Gemini API. Cached input is $0.03 per million.

Gemini 2.5 Flash API pricing, per million tokens
Token typePrice per 1M tokens
Input$0.30
Cached input$0.03
Output$2.50

At these rates, a request with 10,000 input tokens and 1,000 output tokens costs $0.0055 without caching.

Pricing notes: Google's Gemini Developer API pricing page lists Gemini 2.5 Flash Standard pricing at $0.30 input / $2.50 output per million tokens for text, image, and video; Batch pricing is lower.

Rates from Google Gemini API pricing. API model ID: gemini-2.5-flash. Price registry updated November 12, 2026.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash right for your job?

Its place on the LLM Selector’s job rankings, the same order the job pages publish. Describe your own job to see where it stands for that.

Where Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks by benchmark score:

Describe the task and constraints. This selector recommends models; it cannot carry out the task or access your files and accounts.

We keep what you type here, drafts included, for 180 days, and after that only the job and requirements read from it. Nothing is tied to your IP address or account. Leave out names and other personal details. Privacy

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
ReasoningRank #123 of 160Percentile 23rdWeight 17%Not listedUnlisted sources
29.7
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank #132 of 180Percentile 27thWeight 12%Not listedUnlisted sources
36.3
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingRank #113 of 157Percentile 28thWeight 5%Not listedUnlisted sources
45.1
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured

2 of 919 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. KnowledgeNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. MathNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

Gemini 2.5 Flash category percentile values

  • AgenticNot eligible
  • CodingNot eligible
  • Reasoning23rd percentile
  • MultimodalNot eligible
  • Knowledge27th percentile
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • Instruction following28th percentile
  • MathNot eligible

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. AgenticNot ranked
  2. CodingNot ranked
  3. Reasoning#123/160
  4. MultimodalNot ranked
  5. Knowledge#132/180
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. Inst. Following#113/157
  8. MathNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

Benchmark ledger

Every result says who ran the test. External signals opens by default. The tick marks the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference.

Overall rank
#130
of 215 on the leaderboard
Lab-reported
0
None
Run by a benchmark
2
The benchmark’s own run
Independent runs
0
None yet
External signals2 rows
External signals benchmark results, best verified comparison, who ran each test, and whether it counts toward a rank
FailureSensorIQ65.5%

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 69.6%

Gap4.1 behindRun by FailureSensorIQShown only
CompileBenchCompileBench (building real projects from source, pass@1)40.0%

Best verified: GPT-5 (high) · 86.7%

Gap46.7 behindRun by CompileBenchShown only

Every bar is benchmark-run or independent. Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value.

Published price history

This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.

0242024-122026-042026-10Output priceInput price

4 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $2.5 per million tokens.

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Jun 17, 2025 · you are here

    Gemini 2.5 Flash

    Not publicly ranked · $0.3 / $2.5

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
gemini-2.5-flashGoogle Gemini API pricing
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
text, image, video, audioGemini API model page for gemini-2.5-flash
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Published at $0.030 per million cached input tokensGoogle Gemini API pricing
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks #130 of 215 on the public leaderboard with a score of 41.78/100. Its source-verified position is #65 of 81.

Gemini 2.5 Flash is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

Gemini 2.5 Flash sits in the Gemini 2.5 Flash family with Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. 2 of 919 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #113, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #132. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Last updated November 13, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Where to run Gemini 2.5 Flash by API

2 hosts publish a per-token price for it. DeepInfra has the lowest output rate, $2.50 per million tokens. Prices read from each host’s own pages on November 11, 2026.

Inference hosts for Gemini 2.5 Flash with input, output and cached-input prices per million tokens.
HostInput /1MOutput /1MCached /1MContext
DeepInfra$0.30$2.50—1M
OpenRouter$0.30$2.50$0.031.05M
Compare inference hosts

Questions

How does Gemini 2.5 Flash perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks #130 out of 215 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 41.78/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Which sibling models are related to Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash belongs to the Gemini 2.5 Flash family. Related tracked variants include Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does Gemini 2.5 Flash have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Gemini 2.5 Flash currently has 14 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Gemini 2.5 Flash?

Gemini 2.5 Flash has a documented context window of 1M. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with every tracked model1032 comparisons