Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Vals MedScribe (MedScribe)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Vals AI healthcare benchmark for whether models can support doctors with administrative work.

Evaluation results published by Vals AI. Published leaderboard aggregates and evaluation settings only. Dataset contents are not included.

MedScribe score on MedScribe — October 29, 2026

We mirror the published medscribe score view for MedScribe. Claude Opus 5.5 leads the public snapshot at 91.43%, followed by Claude Fable 5.1 (91.29%) and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (91.10%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

109 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 29, 2026

MedScribe score table (109 models)

MedScribe score results for MedScribe
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
91.43%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
91.29%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
91.10%
Not reportedClosed
4Claude Opus 5Anthropic
90.98%
Not reportedClosed
5Muse Spark 1.2Metaxhigh reasoning
90.06%
Not reportedClosed
6Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic
89.54%
Not reportedClosed
7Grok 4.7xAIxhigh reasoning
89.38%
Not reportedClosed
8Muse Wonder FullMetamax reasoning
89.33%
Not reportedClosed
9GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AImax reasoning
88.94%
Not reportedOpen
10Muse Spark 1.1Metaxhigh reasoning
88.89%
Not reportedClosed
11GLM-5.3Z.AImax reasoning
88.81%
Not reportedOpen
12Claude Fable 5Anthropic
88.52%
Not reportedClosed
13MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
88.31%
Not reportedOpen
14GPT-5.1OpenAIhigh reasoning
88.09%
Not reportedClosed
15Kimi K3Moonshot AImax reasoning
88.05%
Not reportedOpen
16GPT-6 AstraOpenAImax reasoning
87.91%
Not reportedClosed
17Gemini 4 ArgonGooglehigh reasoning
87.43%
Not reportedClosed
18MiniMax M3MiniMax
87.25%
Not reportedOpen
19Grok 4.5xAIhigh reasoning
86.88%
Not reportedClosed
20GPT-5.5OpenAIxhigh reasoning
86.87%
Not reportedClosed
21Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
86.74%
Not reportedClosed
22Grok 4.6xAIhigh reasoning
86.53%
Not reportedClosed
23GPT-6.1 SolOpenAImax reasoning
86.45%
Not reportedClosed
24Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Anthropic
86.13%
Not reportedClosed
25Muse SparkMeta
85.90%
Not reportedClosed
26Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
85.75%
Not reportedClosed
27DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekhigh reasoning
85.50%
Not reportedOpen
28InklingThinking Machines Lab0.99 reasoning
85.41%
Not reportedOpen
29Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
85.32%
Not reportedClosed
30MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
85.28%
Not reportedOpen
31GPT-5.6 SolOpenAImax reasoning
85.23%
Not reportedClosed
32Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
85.23%
Not reportedClosed
33Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
84.95%
Not reportedOpen
34Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic
84.52%
Not reportedClosed
35Gemini 3.8 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
84.50%
Not reportedClosed
36GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAImax reasoning
84.39%
Not reportedClosed
37GPT-5.2OpenAIxhigh reasoning
84.39%
Not reportedClosed
38Inkling-SmallThinking Machines Lab0.99 reasoning
84.11%
Not reportedOpen
39Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic
84.10%
Not reportedClosed
40Gemini 3.7 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
83.94%
Not reportedClosed
41Qwen3.8-27BAlibabaxhigh reasoning
83.85%
Not reportedOpen
42MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
83.73%
Not reportedClosed
43GPT-6 LunaOpenAImax reasoning
83.71%
Not reportedClosed
44GPT-5OpenAIhigh reasoning
83.65%
Not reportedUnknown
45Hy4 previewTencent
83.60%
Not reportedOpen
46GLM-5.2Z.AI
83.53%
Not reportedOpen
47Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
83.25%
Not reportedClosed
48Gemini 2.5 Flash ThinkingGoogle
82.98%
Not reportedUnknown
49Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic
82.95%
Not reportedClosed
50Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle
82.87%
Not reportedClosed
51GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIxhigh reasoning
82.87%
Not reportedClosed
52GPT-6 SolOpenAImax reasoning
82.03%
Not reportedClosed
53Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAI
81.63%
Not reportedClosed
54Ling 3.0 Flash 2607Ant
80.90%
Not reportedUnknown
55MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
80.78%
Not reportedUnknown
56GPT-5 miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
80.58%
Not reportedClosed
57Mistral Large 4Mistralhigh reasoning
80.43%
Not reportedOpen
58DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeekhigh reasoning
80.36%
Not reportedOpen
59DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekmax reasoning
80.17%
Not reportedOpen
60MiniMax M2.7MiniMax
79.87%
Not reportedOpen
61Grok 4 Fast Non ReasoningxAI
79.72%
Not reportedUnknown
62Gemini 3.6 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
79.66%
Not reportedClosed
63Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba
79.40%
Not reportedClosed
64Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAI
78.73%
Not reportedClosed
65Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle
78.50%
Not reportedUnknown
66Grok 4 0709xAI
78.15%
Not reportedUnknown
67Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
78.15%
Not reportedOpen
68Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09 2025Google
77.95%
Not reportedUnknown
69GPT-5.4OpenAIxhigh reasoning
77.55%
Not reportedClosed
70Grok 4.1 Fast Non ReasoningxAI
77.46%
Not reportedUnknown
71Qwen3 VL PlusAlibaba
77.13%
Not reportedUnknown
72GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning
77.09%
Not reportedClosed
73Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba
76.96%
Not reportedClosed
74o3OpenAIhigh reasoning
76.65%
Not reportedClosed
75Gemini 3.5 FlashGooglehigh reasoning
76.57%
Not reportedClosed
76Kimi K2.5 ThinkingMoonshot AI
76.44%
Not reportedUnknown
77Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
76.11%
Not reportedUnknown
78Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic
76.05%
Not reportedClosed
79Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025Google
75.82%
Not reportedUnknown
80Ling 3.0 Flash Af Rc3Ant
75.59%
Not reportedUnknown
81DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekmax reasoning
75.14%
Not reportedOpen
82Grok 4.3xAI
74.40%
Not reportedClosed
83Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 ThinkingAnthropic
73.90%
Not reportedUnknown
84Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
73.55%
Not reportedClosed
85GPT-5 nanoOpenAIhigh reasoning
72.86%
Not reportedClosed
86Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
72.83%
Not reportedClosed
87Qwen3 MaxAlibaba
72.71%
Not reportedClosed
88Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic
72.41%
Not reportedUnknown
89GLM-5.1Z.AI
72.27%
Not reportedOpen
90MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
72.15%
Not reportedClosed
91Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
72.04%
Not reportedUnknown
92Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic
71.75%
Not reportedUnknown
93Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGooglehigh reasoning
70.89%
Not reportedClosed
94Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba
70.62%
Not reportedClosed
95Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
69.92%
Not reportedUnknown
96Claude Sonnet 4 20250514 ThinkingAnthropic
69.35%
Not reportedUnknown
97o4-miniOpenAIhigh reasoning
69.14%
Not reportedClosed
98GLM-4.7Z.AI
68.63%
Not reportedOpen
99Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIhigh reasoning
67.73%
Not reportedUnknown
100Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Preview 09 2025 ThinkingGoogle
66.88%
Not reportedUnknown
101Laguna M.1Poolside
65.91%
Not reportedClosed
102Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGooglehigh reasoning
63.90%
Not reportedUnknown
103Grok 4.20 0309 ReasoningxAI
63.41%
Not reportedUnknown
104Laguna XS.2Poolside
61.43%
Not reportedOpen
105Command A Plus 05 2026Cohere
55.68%
Not reportedUnknown
106Mercury 2.5Inceptionhigh reasoning
55.09%
Not reportedClosed
107Llama4 Maverick Instruct BasicFireworks AI
54.22%
Not reportedUnknown
108Meta Llama Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E InstructTogether AI
50.59%
Not reportedUnknown
109Nemotron Lightning 3p5 30b A3bFireworks AI
4.27%
Not reportedUnknown

How MedScribe is shown here

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI MedScribe leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/medscribe and updated by Vals on October 29, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.

MedScribe is display only on BenchLM. Vals proprietary or Vals-hosted aggregate views are useful context, but BenchLM does not use them as weighted ranking inputs or as a replacement for benchmark-native source records.

Snapshot

109 Vals rows1 task viewsprivate datasetTasks: OverallDisplay only

The published MedScribe snapshot places Claude Opus 5.5 first at 91.43%. The third row is 0.33 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 2.54 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

109 models have been evaluated on MedScribe. The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. MedScribe is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About MedScribe

Year

2026

Tasks

Medical administrative support tasks

Format

Accuracy score

Difficulty

Professional healthcare administration

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals MedScribe leaderboard as display-only healthcare evidence.

Freshness and provenance

Version

MedScribe 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does MedScribe measure?

Vals AI healthcare benchmark for whether models can support doctors with administrative work.

Which model leads the published MedScribe snapshot?

Claude Opus 5.5 currently leads the published MedScribe snapshot with 91.43% medscribe score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on MedScribe?

The October 29, 2026 snapshot contains 109 AI models.

Last updated: October 29, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.