Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data
Recommendation

Best Multimodal LLMs in 2026

As of October 10, 2026, the top model among multimodal LLMs on the BenchLM leaderboard is Kimi K3 with a score of 92.6.

Bottom line: the live table ranks how well models read images, documents, and charts. For image generation, look at dedicated image models — this table measures visual understanding.

Ranking data as of

Full Rankings (53 ranked, 1 tracked)

1
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI·Pending·1.05M

92.6

prov. avg

2
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·

92.2

prov. avg

3
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

92.2

prov. avg

4
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba·Open Weight·1M

91.2

prov. avg

5
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

91.2

prov. avg

6
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

89.8

prov. avg

7
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

87.8

prov. avg

8
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

87.7

prov. avg

9
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

87.3

prov. avg

10
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

87.2

prov. avg

11
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

84.5

prov. avg

12
Muse Spark
Meta·Proprietary·262K

84.4

prov. avg

13
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

84.4

prov. avg

14
GLM-5.3-Flash
Z.AI·Open Weight·1M

84

prov. avg

15
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

82

prov. avg

16
Qwen3.7 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

82

prov. avg

17
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

80.1

prov. avg

18
Gemini 3 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

80

prov. avg

19
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

79.6

prov. avg

20
Grok 4.3
xAI·Proprietary·1M

78.8

prov. avg

21
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

76.1

prov. avg

22
GPT-5.2
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

75.9

prov. avg

23
GPT-5.5
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

75.5

prov. avg

24
Step 5 Preview
StepFun·Pending·1M

74.6

prov. avg

25
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

74.5

prov. avg

26
Gemma 4 31B
Google·Open Weight·256K

74.3

prov. avg

27
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

73.8

prov. avg

28
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

73.8

prov. avg

29
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

73.6

prov. avg

30
GPT-5.4
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

73.1

prov. avg

31
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi·Proprietary·1M

72.2

prov. avg

32
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

70.4

prov. avg

33
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

69

prov. avg

34
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

67.8

prov. avg

35
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

67.5

prov. avg

36
Qwen3.5-27B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

67.5

prov. avg

37
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

67.3

prov. avg

38
Qwen3.6-27B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

67.3

prov. avg

39
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google·Open Weight·256K

66.9

prov. avg

40
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

66.4

prov. avg

41
Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta·Open Weight·131K

65.1

prov. avg

42
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

64.6

prov. avg

43
MiniMax M3
MiniMax·Open Weight·1M

60

prov. avg

44
Gemma 4 12B
Google·Open Weight·256K

59.4

prov. avg

45
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

58.7

prov. avg

46
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

53.7

prov. avg

47
Grok 4.20
xAI·Proprietary·2M

53.4

prov. avg

48
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

52.1

prov. avg

49
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

48.6

prov. avg

50
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
NVIDIA·Open Weight·256K

43.8

prov. avg

51
Command A+
Cohere·Open Weight·128K

34.6

prov. avg

52
Gemma 4 E4B
Google·Open Weight·128K

22.2

prov. avg

53
Gemma 4 E2B
Google·Open Weight·128K

13.4

prov. avg

—
Mistral Large 4
Mistral·Pending·1M

Public preview through Mistral Studio; Mistral says the weights are due by the end of October 2026.

—

tracked

Current position

Kimi K3 leads the live multimodal llms ranking at 92.6.

Claude Opus 5 ranks #2 at 92.2.

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks #3 at 92.2.

How to choose

Key Takeaways

The top model is Kimi K3 by Moonshot AI with a provisional score of 92.6.

The best open-weight model is Qwen3.8 Max at position #4.

53 models are ranked here; 1 tracked model is listed without a position.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

The multimodal & grounded score blends image understanding, document/chart reading, and visually grounded reasoning benchmarks. Higher means the model more reliably extracts and reasons over visual content.

Known limitations

These are understanding scores — they say nothing about image generation quality. OCR-heavy production workloads should also test resolution limits and page-count behavior, which benchmarks only partially cover.

About this ranking

Ranking data as of October 10, 2026

This page ranks models by BenchLM's multimodal & grounded category: image understanding, document and chart reading, and visually grounded reasoning. Note the scope: these scores measure how well a model understands images — not how well it generates them. Image-generation systems are a different product class and are not ranked here.

Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM’s provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.

Kimi K3 leads this ranking with a score of 92.6, followed by Claude Opus 5 (92.2) and Claude Opus 5.5 (92.2). The top three are separated by just a few points — any of them would perform well for this use case.

The best open-weight option is Qwen3.8 Max (ranked #4 with a score of 91.2). While proprietary models lead, open-weight options are within striking distance for teams willing to trade a few points of performance for full model control.

This ranking uses provisional weighted averages across the scoring benchmarks in multimodalGrounded. For detailed model profiles, click any model name above. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

Questions

What is the best multimodal LLM?

The first row of the multimodal & grounded table above is the current answer. The table recomputes with every data refresh, so check the date on the ranking. For a budget pick, check the multimodal value ranking, which divides this category score by output price, then test your own images and documents.

What is the best LLM for image generation?

This page ranks image understanding, not generation — LLM leaderboards measure how well models read and reason over images. Image generation is a separate product class (diffusion and autoregressive image models) that BenchLM's categories do not currently score. Treat any "LLM" ranking of image generation with skepticism.

Which LLM is best for reading documents and PDFs?

Document understanding tracks the multimodal & grounded category closely, so start from the top rows of the table above. Long-context support matters as much as vision quality for multi-hundred-page work — see the large-context rankings for models pairing 1M-token windows with strong vision.

Can these models understand charts and tables?

The top rows handle standard charts and tables well — chart-reading benchmarks feed this category. Reliability drops on dense dashboards, small text, and unusual chart types, so test your hardest real documents rather than trusting a single aggregate score.

Explore More

Last updated: October 10, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,500+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.