Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data
Recommendation

Best Value Multimodal AI Model in 2026 — Cost-Adjusted Rankings

As of October 8, 2026, the top model in best value multimodal ai model on the BenchLM leaderboard is GPT-5.6 Luna with a score of 56.8.

Bottom line: Multimodal inputs are large and expensive.

Ranking data as of

Full Rankings (32 ranked, 1 tracked)

1
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

56.75

Score/$

Score: 68.1 · $1.2/1M

2
MiniMax M3
MiniMax·Open Weight·1M

42.92

Score/$

Score: 51.5 · $1.2/1M

3
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

34.58

Score/$

Score: 49.8 · $1.44/1M

4
Grok 4.3
xAI·Proprietary·1M

26.68

Score/$

Score: 66.7 · $2.5/1M

5
Step 5 Preview
StepFun·Pending·1M

22.67

Score/$

Score: 61.2 · $2.7/1M

6
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

22.37

Score/$

Score: 83.9 · $3.75/1M

7
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

22.29

Score/$

Score: 83.6 · $3.75/1M

8
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

22.27

Score/$

Score: 66.8 · $3/1M

9
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

19.92

Score/$

Score: 24.9 · $1.25/1M

10
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

17.75

Score/$

Score: 63.9 · $3.6/1M

11
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

16.23

Score/$

Score: 64.9 · $4/1M

12
Grok 4.20
xAI·Proprietary·2M

14.24

Score/$

Score: 35.6 · $2.5/1M

13
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

12.96

Score/$

Score: 58.3 · $4.5/1M

14
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

10.6

Score/$

Score: 49.6 · $4.68/1M

15
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

9.76

Score/$

Score: 87.8 · $9/1M

16
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

7.84

Score/$

Score: 78.4 · $10/1M

17
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

6.68

Score/$

Score: 80.1 · $12/1M

18
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

6.52

Score/$

Score: 78.2 · $12/1M

19
Gemini 3 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

6.27

Score/$

Score: 75.2 · $12/1M

20
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI·Pending·1.05M

5.96

Score/$

Score: 89.4 · $15/1M

21
GPT-5.2
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

4.81

Score/$

Score: 67.3 · $14/1M

22
GPT-5.4
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

4.62

Score/$

Score: 69.3 · $15/1M

23
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

4.44

Score/$

Score: 88.8 · $20/1M

24
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

4.43

Score/$

Score: 88.6 · $20/1M

25
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

3.67

Score/$

Score: 55.1 · $15/1M

26
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·

3.55

Score/$

Score: 88.8 · $25/1M

27
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

3.51

Score/$

Score: 87.7 · $25/1M

28
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.42

Score/$

Score: 60.6 · $25/1M

29
GPT-5.5
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

2.38

Score/$

Score: 71.4 · $30/1M

30
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2

Score/$

Score: 50.1 · $25/1M

31
Command A+
Cohere·Open Weight·128K

1.61

Score/$

Score: 16.1 · $10/1M

32
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

0.98

Score/$

Score: 24.5 · $25/1M

—
Mistral Large 4
Mistral·Pending·1M

Public preview through Mistral Studio; Mistral says the weights are due by the end of October 2026.

—

tracked

How to choose

Key Takeaways

The best value model is GPT-5.6 Luna by OpenAI with a provisional Score/$ ratio of 56.75 (score: 68.1, output: $1.2/1M tokens).

The best open-weight model is MiniMax M3 at position #2.

32 models are ranked here; 1 tracked model is listed without a position.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

Value scores divide the weighted multimodal score by output token price (per 1M tokens). Higher means more capability per dollar. Models with no listed price are excluded.

Known limitations

Value rankings favor cheap models even if absolute performance is modest. A model scoring half as well at one-tenth the price wins on value — but may not meet your quality bar. Always check raw scores alongside value rankings.

About this ranking

Ranking data as of October 8, 2026

Multimodal workloads — processing images, charts, documents, and screenshots — often involve large inputs that drive up token costs quickly. This ranking divides each model's weighted multimodal score (MMMU-Pro, OfficeQA-Pro) by output token price. For document processing pipelines and visual AI applications running at scale, the value leaders here offer the best multimodal reasoning per dollar spent.

Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM’s provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.

GPT-5.6 Luna leads this ranking with a score of 56.75, followed by MiniMax M3 (42.92) and Inkling-Small (34.58). There is a significant gap between the leading models and the rest of the field.

The best open-weight option is MiniMax M3 (ranked #2 with a score of 42.92). Open-weight models are highly competitive in this category — self-hosting is a viable alternative to proprietary APIs.

This ranking uses provisional weighted averages across the scoring benchmarks in multimodalGrounded. For detailed model profiles, click any model name above. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

Explore More

Last updated: October 8, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,500+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.