Seed 1.6 Benchmark Scores & Performance

Benchmark analysis of Seed 1.6 by ByteDance across 32 sourced tests on BenchLM.

According to BenchLM.ai, Seed 1.6 ranks #44 out of 123 models with an overall score of 65/100. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

Seed 1.6 is a proprietary model with a 256K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

Seed 1.6 sits inside the Seed 1.6 family alongside Seed 1.6 Flash.

Its strongest category is Multimodal & Grounded (#27), while its weakest is Knowledge (#58). This performance profile makes it particularly strong for screenshots, documents, charts, and grounded multimodal workflows.

Creator

ByteDance

Source Type

Proprietary

Reasoning

Reasoning

Context Window

256K

Overall Score

65#44 of 123

Arena Elo

1263

Family & Lineage

Family

Seed 1.6

Base entry

Sibling Models

Knowledge Benchmarks

MMLU
73
GPQA
72
SuperGPQA
70
OpenBookQA
68
MMLU-Pro
75
HLE
11
FrontierScience
68

Coding Benchmarks

HumanEval
64
SWE-bench Verified
46
LiveCodeBench
38
SWE-bench Pro
46

Mathematics Benchmarks

AIME 2023
72
AIME 2024
74
AIME 2025
73
HMMT Feb 2023
68
HMMT Feb 2024
70
HMMT Feb 2025
69
BRUMO 2025
71
MATH-500
82

Reasoning Benchmarks

SimpleQA
69
MuSR
69
BBH
86
LongBench v2
77
MRCRv2
78

Agentic Benchmarks

Terminal-Bench 2.0
63
BrowseComp
67
OSWorld-Verified
58

Multimodal & Grounded Benchmarks

MMMU-Pro
80
OfficeQA Pro
79

Instruction Following Benchmarks

IFEval
87

Multilingual Benchmarks

MGSM
88
MMLU-ProX
81

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Seed 1.6 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Seed 1.6 ranks #44 out of 123 models with an overall score of 65. It is created by ByteDance and features a 256K context window.

Is Seed 1.6 good for knowledge and understanding?

Seed 1.6 ranks #58 out of 123 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 56.4. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for coding and programming?

Seed 1.6 ranks #52 out of 123 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 42.4. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for mathematics?

Seed 1.6 ranks #55 out of 123 models in mathematics benchmarks with an average score of 75.9. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for reasoning and logic?

Seed 1.6 ranks #50 out of 123 models in reasoning and logic benchmarks with an average score of 74.5. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Seed 1.6 ranks #41 out of 123 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 62.3. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Seed 1.6 ranks #27 out of 123 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 79.6. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for instruction following?

Seed 1.6 ranks #34 out of 123 models in instruction following benchmarks with an average score of 87. There are stronger options in this category.

Is Seed 1.6 good for multilingual tasks?

Seed 1.6 ranks #27 out of 123 models in multilingual tasks benchmarks with an average score of 83.4. There are stronger options in this category.

Which sibling models are related to Seed 1.6?

Seed 1.6 belongs to the Seed 1.6 family. Related variants on BenchLM include Seed 1.6 Flash.

What is the context window size of Seed 1.6?

Seed 1.6 has a context window of 256K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Updates

New model releases, benchmark scores, and leaderboard changes. Every Friday.

Free. Your signup is stored with a derived country code for compliance routing.