Scale Labs FORTRESS (FORTRESS)
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
A Scale Labs public leaderboard mirrored as display-only reference data. It does not affect BenchLM rankings.
Scale score on FORTRESS — November 12, 2026 snapshot
We mirror the published scale score view for FORTRESS. DeepSeek-R1 leads the public snapshot at 74.4%, followed by glm-4p5-air (63.2%) and Gemini 2.5 Pro (06-05) (61.7%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
glm-4p5-air
Z.AI
Gemini 2.5 Pro (06-05)
82 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 12, 2026 snapshot
Scale score table (82 models)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | 74.4% | Not reported | Open |
| 2 | glm-4p5-airZ.AI | 63.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (06-05)Google | 61.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba | 61.4% | Not reported | Open |
| 5 | DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek | 60.5% | Not reported | Open |
| 6 | glm-4p5Z.AI | 59.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 7 | GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI | 59.2% | Not reported | Closed |
| 8 | Qwen 2.5 72BAlibaba | 56.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | Mixtral 8x22BMistral | 56.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 10 | kimi-k2-instructMoonshot AI | 55.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 11 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (03-25)Google | 54.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle | 53.9% | Not reported | Closed |
| 13 | GPT-4.1OpenAI | 53.0% | Not reported | Closed |
| 14 | minimax-m3p1-flashMiniMax | 52.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 15 | gemini-3.1-flash-lite-previewGoogle | 51.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 16 | Gemini 1.5 FlashGoogle | 50.6% | Not reported | Closed |
| 17 | GLM-5.2Z.AI | 48.7% | Not reported | Open |
| 18 | GPT-4o miniOpenAI | 48.1% | Not reported | Closed |
| 19 | GPT-4oOpenAI | 47.2% | Not reported | Closed |
| 20 | Llama 3.3 70BMeta | 44.8% | Not reported | Open |
| 21 | Llama 3.1 70BMeta | 44.2% | Not reported | Open |
| 22 | gemini-3-pro-previewGoogle | 41.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI | 41.1% | Not reported | Open |
| 24 | Llama 4 MaverickMeta | 40.1% | Not reported | Open |
| 25 | Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropic | 38.0% | Not reported | Closed |
| 26 | Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropic | 30.4% | Not reported | Closed |
| 27 | gpt-5.1-instantOpenAI | 30.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 28 | o3-miniOpenAI | 30.1% | Not reported | Closed |
| 29 | gemini-3.1-pro-previewGoogle | 29.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 30 | glm-5p3 maxZ.AI | 28.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 31 | Claude Opus 4Anthropic | 27.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 32 | Kimi K3Moonshot AI | 27.3% | Not reported | Open |
| 33 | deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017Deepseek | 27.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 34 | glm-5p3-flashZ.AI | 26.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 35 | kimi-k3 maxMoonshot AI | 26.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 36 | nemotron-3-ultra-nvfp4 highNvidia | 26.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 37 | gpt-5.1-thinkingOpenAI | 25.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 38 | inkling xhighThinking Machines | 25.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 39 | Claude 4 Opus (thinking)Anthropic | 24.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 40 | Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic | 24.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 41 | Mistral Large 4Mistral | 23.1% | Not reported | Open |
| 42 | qwen3p8-2p4t-a95b xhighAlibaba | 21.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 43 | o4-miniOpenAI | 21.5% | Not reported | Closed |
| 44 | Llama 3.1 405BMeta | 20.6% | Not reported | Open |
| 45 | claude-opus-4-6 (Non-Thinking)Anthropic | 20.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 46 | Muse SparkMeta | 20.2% | Not reported | Closed |
| 47 | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | 20.1% | Not reported | Closed |
| 48 | o1OpenAI | 19.4% | Not reported | Closed |
| 49 | kimi-k3p1-proMoonshot AI | 18.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 50 | Claude Opus 4.8 maxAnthropic | 18.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 51 | GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI | 18.2% | Not reported | Closed |
| 52 | Claude 4 Sonnet (thinking)Anthropic | 18.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 53 | GPT-OSS 20BOpenAI | 17.6% | Not reported | Open |
| 54 | GPT-5.2OpenAI | 17.5% | Not reported | Closed |
| 55 | gpt-5-2025-08-07OpenAI | 17.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 56 | GPT-5 miniOpenAI | 17% | Not reported | Closed |
| 57 | Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | 17.0% | Not reported | Closed |
| 58 | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | 16.8% | Not reported | Closed |
| 59 | Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle | 16.4% | Not reported | Closed |
| 60 | gpt-5.5-xhighOpenAI | 16.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 61 | claude-opus-4-1-20250805Anthropic | 16.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 62 | o3OpenAI | 16.0% | Not reported | Closed |
| 63 | Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic | 15.6% | Not reported | Closed |
| 64 | gpt-5-pro-2025-10-06OpenAI | 15.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 65 | GPT-5.4 ProOpenAI | 14.8% | Not reported | Closed |
| 66 | claude-opus-4-1-20250805-thinkingAnthropic | 14.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 67 | Fable-5.1Anthropic | 13.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 68 | Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic | 13.6% | Not reported | Closed |
| 69 | GPT-6 SolOpenAI | 13.5% | Not reported | Closed |
| 70 | Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic | 13.2% | Not reported | Closed |
| 71 | claude-opus-4-6-thinking-maxAnthropic | 13% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 72 | Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic | 13.0% | Not reported | Closed |
| 73 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 12.8% | Not reported | Closed |
| 74 | Muse Spark 1.1Meta | 12.4% | Not reported | Closed |
| 75 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | 12.1% | Not reported | Closed |
| 76 | beam-1p0-501b-a23bReflection | 11.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 77 | GPT-6 LunaOpenAI | 10.8% | Not reported | Closed |
| 78 | Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic | 9.6% | Not reported | Closed |
| 79 | Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic | 9.5% | Not reported | Closed |
| 80 | GPT-OSS 120BOpenAI | 8.2% | Not reported | Open |
| 81 | Muse Spark OpenMeta | 7.6% | Not reported | Open |
| 82 | claude-opus-5-5-maxAnthropic | 5.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
How to read this leaderboard
Compare the published configurations as complete evaluation systems. The source can combine a base model, agent scaffold, tools, budget, and inference setting in each result.
Operator receipt: 82 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is DeepSeek-R1 at 74.4%.
Honest limit: This Scale table is display-only context, not benchmark provenance or a weighted model-only comparison.
How BenchLM shows FORTRESS
BenchLM mirrors 82 published rows from Scale Labs’ public FORTRESS leaderboard, captured on November 12, 2026 snapshot.
The table is display only. It is useful context for a published agent or model configuration, but it does not enter BenchLM’s overall or category rankings.
The published FORTRESS snapshot places DeepSeek-R1 first at 74.4%. The third row is 12.7 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 18.9 points, so the table still separates the published systems.
82 models have been evaluated on FORTRESS. The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. FORTRESS is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About FORTRESS
Year
2026
Tasks
82 published rows
Format
Published Scale leaderboard score
Difficulty
External agent and model evaluation
BenchLM mirrors 82 published rows from the FORTRESS public table captured on November 12, 2026 snapshot.
Freshness and provenance
Version
FORTRESS 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does FORTRESS measure?
A Scale Labs public leaderboard mirrored as display-only reference data. It does not affect BenchLM rankings.
Which model leads the published FORTRESS snapshot?
DeepSeek-R1 currently leads the published FORTRESS snapshot with 74.4% scale score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on FORTRESS?
The November 12, 2026 snapshot snapshot contains 82 AI models.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 7,000+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.