Skip to main content

Best Non-Reasoning LLMs in 2026

Top standard AI models (no chain-of-thought reasoning) ranked by benchmark performance. Faster and cheaper than reasoning models.

Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM's provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.

Bottom line: Non-reasoning models are faster and cheaper than chain-of-thought alternatives. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads this tier — proving that strong reasoning scores are possible without dedicated thinking tokens.

According to BenchLM.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro leads this ranking with a score of 92, followed by Grok 4.1 (90) and Claude Opus 4.6 (87). There is meaningful separation between the top models, suggesting genuine performance differences.

The best open-weight option is MiniMax M3 (ranked #7 with a score of 76). While proprietary models lead, open-weight options are within striking distance for teams willing to trade a few points of performance for full model control.

This ranking is based on provisional overall weighted scores across BenchLM.ai's scoring formula tracked by BenchLM.ai. For detailed model profiles, click any model name below. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

What changed

Gemini 3.1 Pro leads non-reasoning models — best reasoning (97), knowledge (96), and multilingual (100).

Claude Opus 4.6 most consistent non-reasoning model across all 8 categories.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 strong mid-tier with best multimodal (95) in this tier.

How to choose

Full Rankings (69 models)

Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

92

prov. overall

Grok 4.1
xAI·Proprietary·1M

90

prov. overall

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

87

prov. overall

4
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

83

prov. overall

5
Gemini 3 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

81

prov. overall

6
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

76

prov. overall

7
MiniMax M3
MiniMax·Open Weight·1M

76

prov. overall

8
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

69

prov. overall

9
Grok 4.1 Fast
xAI·Proprietary·1M

69

prov. overall

10
GLM-5
Z.AI·Open Weight·200K

67

prov. overall

11
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

65

prov. overall

12
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

64

prov. overall

13
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

64

prov. overall

14
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

63

prov. overall

15
Grok 4
xAI·Proprietary·128K

63

prov. overall

16
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

57

prov. overall

17
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

57

prov. overall

18
GPT-4.1
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

57

prov. overall

19
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

56

prov. overall

20
Gemini 3 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

56

prov. overall

21
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax·Open Weight·200K

54

prov. overall

22
Claude 4.1 Opus
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

51

prov. overall

23
DeepSeek Coder 2.0
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

51

prov. overall

24
DeepSeek LLM 2.0
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

51

prov. overall

25
Qwen2.5-1M
Alibaba·Open Weight·1M

51

prov. overall

26
Claude 4 Sonnet
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

50

prov. overall

27
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

49

prov. overall

28
Mistral Large 3
Mistral·Proprietary·128K

49

prov. overall

29
Qwen2.5-72B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

49

prov. overall

30
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google·Proprietary·1M

48

prov. overall

31
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

45

prov. overall

32
Nemotron 3 Super 100B
NVIDIA·Open Weight·1M

43

prov. overall

33
GPT-4o
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

42

prov. overall

34
Kimi K2
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

41

prov. overall

35
Llama 3.1 405B
Meta·Open Weight·128K

41

prov. overall

36
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

40

prov. overall

37
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI·Proprietary·256K

39

prov. overall

38
Mistral Large 2
Mistral·Proprietary·128K

38

prov. overall

39
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

37

prov. overall

40
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

35

prov. overall

41
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

35

prov. overall

42
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

34

prov. overall

43
GPT-OSS 120B
OpenAI·Open Weight·128K

34

prov. overall

44
DBRX Instruct
Databricks·Open Weight·32K

32

prov. overall

45
Qwen3 235B 2507
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

32

prov. overall

46
Grok 3 [Beta]
xAI·Proprietary·128K

31

prov. overall

47
Phi-4
Microsoft·Open Weight·16K

28

prov. overall

48
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

27

prov. overall

49
GLM-4.5
Z.AI·Proprietary·128K

26

prov. overall

50
Llama 3 70B
Meta·Open Weight·128K

26

prov. overall

51
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

25

prov. overall

52
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

25

prov. overall

53
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
NVIDIA·Open Weight·32K

25

prov. overall

54
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google·Proprietary·32K

24

prov. overall

55
Mistral 8x7B
Mistral·Open Weight·32K

24

prov. overall

56
Z-1
Z·Proprietary·128K

24

prov. overall

57
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

23

prov. overall

58
Moonshot v1
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

23

prov. overall

59
Llama 4 Scout
Meta·Open Weight·10M

22

prov. overall

60
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1
Mistral·Open Weight·64K

22

prov. overall

61
Nemotron-4 15B
NVIDIA·Open Weight·32K

22

prov. overall

62
GLM-4.5-Air
Z.AI·Proprietary·128K

19

prov. overall

63
Gemma 3 27B
Google·Open Weight·32K

17

prov. overall

64
GPT-OSS 20B
OpenAI·Open Weight·128K

17

prov. overall

65
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta·Open Weight·1M

17

prov. overall

66
Llama 4 Behemoth
Meta·Open Weight·32K

12

prov. overall

67
Nova Pro
Amazon·Proprietary·128K

10

prov. overall

68
Mistral 7B v0.3
Mistral·Open Weight·32K

4

prov. overall

69
Mistral 8x7B v0.2
Mistral·Open Weight·32K

1

prov. overall

These rankings update weekly

Get notified when models move. One email a week with what changed and why.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Key Takeaways

The top model is Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google with a provisional score of 92.

The best open-weight model is MiniMax M3 at position #7.

69 models are included in this ranking.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

Non-reasoning models are standard completion/chat models without dedicated chain-of-thought. They are ranked by the same overall BenchLM score and are typically faster and cheaper per token.

Known limitations

The "non-reasoning" label excludes models with explicit chain-of-thought (like o3, DeepSeek R1). Some non-reasoning models still reason internally — the distinction is about architecture and pricing, not capability.

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.