Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

Start free brief

BenchLM recommendation

Best Value Agentic AI Model in 2026 — Cost-Adjusted Rankings

Data verified

As of August 15, 2026, the top model in best value agentic ai model on the BenchLM leaderboard is Laguna S 2.1 with a score of 266.8.

Last verified: August 15, 2026

Agentic workloads are token-intensive — agents loop, retry, and chain multiple calls. That makes cost-per-token a critical factor alongside raw capability. This ranking divides each model's weighted agentic score (Terminal-Bench 2.0, BrowseComp, OSWorld-Verified) by its output token price. The result shows which models give you the most agent capability per dollar. If you're building production AI agents with budget constraints, this is where you start.

Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM's provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.

Bottom line: Agentic tasks are token-intensive — value matters more here than almost anywhere. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads, with GPT-4o mini offering competitive agentic value.

Laguna S 2.1 leads this ranking with a score of 266.8, followed by Ministral 3 3B (207.9) and Ministral 3 14B (157.95). There is a significant gap between the leading models and the rest of the field.

The best open-weight option is Laguna S 2.1 (ranked #1 with a score of 266.8). Open-weight models are highly competitive in this category — self-hosting is a viable alternative to proprietary APIs.

This ranking uses provisional weighted averages across the scoring benchmarks in agentic. For detailed model profiles, click any model name below. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

What changed

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite leads agentic value — most agent capability per dollar.

GPT-4o mini strong agentic value in OpenAI's lineup.

Gemini 2.5 Flash good agentic performance at Flash-tier pricing.

How to choose

Full Rankings (77 models)

1
Laguna S 2.1
Poolside·Open Weight·1M

266.8

Score/$

Score: 53.4 · $0.2/1M

2
Ministral 3 3B
Mistral·Open Weight·128K

207.9

Score/$

Score: 20.8 · $0.1/1M

3
Ministral 3 14B
Mistral·Open Weight·128K

157.95

Score/$

Score: 31.6 · $0.2/1M

4
Ministral 3 8B
Mistral·Open Weight·128K

149

Score/$

Score: 22.4 · $0.15/1M

5
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

102.2

Score/$

Score: 40.9 · $0.4/1M

6
Mistral Small 4
Mistral·Open Weight·256K

71.35

Score/$

Score: 42.8 · $0.6/1M

7
Mercury 2
Inception·Proprietary·128K

56.97

Score/$

Score: 42.7 · $0.75/1M

8
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek·Proprietary·1M

56.67

Score/$

Score: 49.3 · $0.87/1M

9
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

55.85

Score/$

Score: 33.5 · $0.6/1M

10
Pokee-Isaac 28B
Pokee AI·Proprietary·10M

52.17

Score/$

Score: 52.2 · $1/1M

11
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

44.42

Score/$

Score: 53.3 · $1.2/1M

12
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun·Open Weight·256K

39.57

Score/$

Score: 45.5 · $1.15/1M

13
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

39.39

Score/$

Score: 56.7 · $1.44/1M

14
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax·Proprietary·128K

36.12

Score/$

Score: 43.3 · $1.2/1M

15
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

34.85

Score/$

Score: 38.3 · $1.1/1M

16
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

34.33

Score/$

Score: 42.9 · $1.25/1M

17
MiniMax M3
MiniMax·Open Weight·1M

33.13

Score/$

Score: 39.8 · $1.2/1M

18
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax·Open Weight·200K

28.51

Score/$

Score: 34.2 · $1.2/1M

19
Mistral Large 3
Mistral·Proprietary·128K

28.49

Score/$

Score: 42.7 · $1.5/1M

20
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

25.98

Score/$

Score: 41.6 · $1.6/1M

21
Composer 2.5
Cursor·Proprietary·200K

21.31

Score/$

Score: 53.3 · $2.5/1M

22
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

20.91

Score/$

Score: 41.8 · $2/1M

23
Composer 2
Cursor·Proprietary·200K

20.84

Score/$

Score: 52.1 · $2.5/1M

24
Qwen3.5 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

20.28

Score/$

Score: 48.7 · $2.4/1M

25
Holo3-122B-A10B
H Company·Proprietary·64K

17.86

Score/$

Score: 53.6 · $3/1M

26
GLM-5
Z.AI·Open Weight·200K

17.26

Score/$

Score: 55.2 · $3.2/1M

27
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

16.75

Score/$

Score: 50.2 · $3/1M

28
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

15.47

Score/$

Score: 58 · $3.75/1M

29
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta·Proprietary·1M

14.75

Score/$

Score: 62.7 · $4.25/1M

30
Grok Build 0.1
xAI·Proprietary·256K

14.45

Score/$

Score: 28.9 · $2/1M

31
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

13.27

Score/$

Score: 47.8 · $3.6/1M

32
GLM-5.2
Z.AI·Open Weight·1M

13.25

Score/$

Score: 58.3 · $4.4/1M

33
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

12.96

Score/$

Score: 38.9 · $3/1M

34
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google·Proprietary·1M

12.58

Score/$

Score: 31.5 · $2.5/1M

35
Grok 4.6
xAI·Proprietary·500K

11.12

Score/$

Score: 66.7 · $6/1M

36
GLM-5.1
Z.AI·Open Weight·203K

10.78

Score/$

Score: 47.5 · $4.4/1M

37
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

10.43

Score/$

Score: 41.7 · $4/1M

38
Grok 4.5
xAI·Proprietary·500K

10.27

Score/$

Score: 61.6 · $6/1M

39
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

10.23

Score/$

Score: 51.1 · $5/1M

40
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

10.03

Score/$

Score: 40.1 · $4/1M

41
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

8.59

Score/$

Score: 40.2 · $4.68/1M

42
Grok 4.20
xAI·Proprietary·2M

8.47

Score/$

Score: 50.8 · $6/1M

43
Gemini 3 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

8.41

Score/$

Score: 25.2 · $3/1M

44
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

8.34

Score/$

Score: 37.6 · $4.5/1M

45
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

6.51

Score/$

Score: 65.1 · $10/1M

46
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
Mistral·Open Weight·256K

6.07

Score/$

Score: 45.6 · $7.5/1M

47
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

5.17

Score/$

Score: 38.8 · $7.5/1M

48
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

5.15

Score/$

Score: 46.3 · $9/1M

49
GPT-5 (high)
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

5.06

Score/$

Score: 50.6 · $10/1M

50
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

4.93

Score/$

Score: 59.2 · $12/1M

51
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI·Pending·1.05M

4.92

Score/$

Score: 73.9 · $15/1M

52
Gemini 3 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

4.9

Score/$

Score: 58.8 · $12/1M

53
GPT-5.1
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

4.89

Score/$

Score: 48.9 · $10/1M

54
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

4.78

Score/$

Score: 47.8 · $10/1M

55
Command A+
Cohere·Open Weight·128K

4.42

Score/$

Score: 44.2 · $10/1M

56
GPT-5.3 Codex
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

4.39

Score/$

Score: 61.5 · $14/1M

57
GPT-5.4
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

3.86

Score/$

Score: 57.9 · $15/1M

58
GPT-5.2-Codex
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

3.82

Score/$

Score: 53.5 · $14/1M

59
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

3.47

Score/$

Score: 52 · $15/1M

60
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·

3.19

Score/$

Score: 79.7 · $25/1M

61
GPT-5.2
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

3.18

Score/$

Score: 44.5 · $14/1M

62
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

3.13

Score/$

Score: 46.9 · $15/1M

63
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

2.97

Score/$

Score: 35.7 · $12/1M

64
Claude 4 Sonnet
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

2.82

Score/$

Score: 42.4 · $15/1M

65
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.58

Score/$

Score: 64.6 · $25/1M

66
Grok 4.3
xAI·Proprietary·1M

2.49

Score/$

Score: 6.2 · $2.5/1M

67
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.45

Score/$

Score: 61.2 · $25/1M

68
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.34

Score/$

Score: 58.4 · $25/1M

69
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.33

Score/$

Score: 58.2 · $25/1M

70
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

2.29

Score/$

Score: 68.8 · $30/1M

71
GPT-5.5
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

2.17

Score/$

Score: 65.2 · $30/1M

72
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M+

1.52

Score/$

Score: 76.1 · $50/1M

73
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M+

1.52

Score/$

Score: 75.8 · $50/1M

74
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

1.45

Score/$

Score: 36.3 · $25/1M

75
Claude 4.1 Opus
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

0.6

Score/$

Score: 45.2 · $75/1M

76
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

0.34

Score/$

Score: 61.1 · $180/1M

77
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

0.33

Score/$

Score: 59 · $180/1M

Key Takeaways

The best value model is Laguna S 2.1 by Poolside with a provisional Score/$ ratio of 266.8 (score: 53.4, output: $0.2/1M tokens).

The best open-weight model is Laguna S 2.1 at position #1.

77 models are included in this ranking.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

Value scores divide the weighted agentic score by output token price (per 1M tokens). Higher means more capability per dollar. Models with no listed price are excluded.

Known limitations

Value rankings favor cheap models even if absolute performance is modest. A model scoring half as well at one-tenth the price wins on value — but may not meet your quality bar. Always check raw scores alongside value rankings.

Last updated: August 15, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.