Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Artificial Analysis SciCode (AA-SciCode)

Data verified

An Artificial Analysis SciCode score.

Top models on AA-SciCode — November 13, 2026

As of November 13, 2026, Claude Fable 5.2 leads the AA-SciCode leaderboard with 67.7% , followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (66.9%) and Claude Fable 5.1 (63.1%).

124 modelsCoding5% of Coding reference weightCurrentUpdated November 13, 2026

Leaderboard (124 models)

Of 124 results: 103 independent, 21 carried from an upstream page.

Ranks on this table count the 103 benchmark-run and independent results. A result where who ran it is not recorded keeps its place by score, without a rank.

Lab-reported
0
Independent
103
Benchmark-run
0
Carried from upstream
21
Who ran it

Showing all 124 results, in score order.

AA-SciCode leaderboard
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Claude Fable 5.2AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
67.7%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
66.9%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
63.1%
Not reportedClosed
4Muse Wonder FullMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
62.6%
Not reportedClosed
5Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
61.8%
Not reportedClosed
6Claude Fable 5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
61.0%
Not reportedClosed
7Claude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
61.0%
Not reportedClosed
8MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
60.9%
Not reportedOpen
9Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
60.8%
Not reportedOpen
10Muse WonderMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
60.3%
Not reportedClosed
11Kimi K3Moonshot AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
59.5%
Not reportedOpen
12GLM-5.3Z.AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
59.0%
Not reportedOpen
13Step 5 PreviewStepFunIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
58.9%
Not reportedOpen
14Muse Spark 1.1MetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
58.8%
Not reportedClosed
15Muse Spark 1.3MetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
58.8%
Not reportedClosed
No rank on this tableGemini 3.1 ProGoogleCarried from an upstream page
58.7%
Not reportedClosed
16Muse Spark OpenMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
58.4%
Not reportedOpen
17GPT-6 SolOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
57.6%
Not reportedClosed
18Muse Spark 1.2MetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
57.4%
Not reportedClosed
19Grok 4.7xAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
57.4%
Not reportedClosed
20Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
57.2%
Not reportedClosed
21GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
57.1%
Not reportedClosed
22Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
56.6%
Not reportedClosed
23GPT-6 AstraOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
56.5%
Not reportedClosed
24Grok 4.6xAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
56.5%
Not reportedClosed
25Claude Opus 5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
56.4%
Not reportedClosed
26GPT-5.5OpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
55.8%
Not reportedClosed
27GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
55.1%
Not reportedClosed
28GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
55.0%
Not reportedClosed
29Claude Haiku 5.5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
55.0%
Not reportedClosed
30Grok 4.5xAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
55.0%
Not reportedClosed
31GPT-6 LunaOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
54.6%
Not reportedClosed
32Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
54.4%
Not reportedClosed
33Claude Sonnet 5AnthropicIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
54.3%
Not reportedClosed
34GPT-6.1 SolOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
54.2%
Not reportedClosed
35Ling 3.1 FlashInclusionAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
54.1%
Not reportedOpen
36Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
53.9%
Not reportedClosed
37GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
53.6%
Not reportedClosed
38Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
53.4%
Not reportedClosed
39MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMaxIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
53.4%
Not reportedClosed
40Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines LabIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
52.3%
Not reportedClosed
41GPT-5.4 miniOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
52.1%
Not reportedClosed
No rank on this tableQwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibabaCarried from an upstream page
52.1%
Not reportedClosed
42DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
51.9%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableKimi K2.6Moonshot AICarried from an upstream page
51.5%
Not reportedOpen
43MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomiIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
51.3%
Not reportedOpen
44GLM-5.2Z.AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
51.2%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekCarried from an upstream page
51.0%
Not reportedOpen
45MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
50.6%
Not reportedClosed
46Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
50.6%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeekCarried from an upstream page
50.3%
Not reportedOpen
47MiniMax M2.7MiniMaxIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
50.1%
Not reportedOpen
48Inkling-SmallThinking Machines LabIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
49.7%
Not reportedOpen
49Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
49.5%
Not reportedClosed
50Hy3TencentIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
48.6%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableHy3 PreviewTencentCarried from an upstream page
48.6%
Not reportedOpen
51Beam 1.0 501B-A23BReflection AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
48.5%
Not reportedOpen
52Grok 4.3xAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
48.3%
Not reportedClosed
53Quasar 438BMultiverse ComputingIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
48.1%
Not reportedClosed
No rank on this tableSolar Pro 4UpstageCarried from an upstream page
48.0%
Not reportedClosed
54Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
47.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12BNVIDIACarried from an upstream page
47.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B A12B NVFP4NVIDIACarried from an upstream page
47.8%
Not reportedOpen
55GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
47.2%
Not reportedClosed
56MiniMax M3MiniMaxIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
47.1%
Not reportedOpen
57InklingThinking Machines LabIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
47.0%
Not reportedOpen
58Qwen3.8-27BAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
46.6%
Not reportedOpen
59DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)DeepSeekIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
46.4%
Not reportedOpen
60Gemini 2.5 ProGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
46.3%
Not reportedClosed
61Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
46.1%
Not reportedClosed
62Gemma 4 31BGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
45.5%
Not reportedOpen
63Apodex 1.1ApodexIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
45.5%
Not reportedClosed
No rank on this tableApodex 1.1 MiniApodexCarried from an upstream page
45.5%
Not reportedOpen
64Muse Glimmer 30BMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
44.9%
Not reportedOpen
65GLM-5.1Z.AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
44.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableQwen3.5 397BAlibabaCarried from an upstream page
44.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)AlibabaCarried from an upstream page
44.8%
Not reportedOpen
66Ling 3.0 Flash VLInclusionAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
44.2%
Not reportedOpen
67Step 3.7 FlashStepFunIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
43.9%
Not reportedOpen
68Qwen3.6-27BAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
42.8%
Not reportedOpen
69Ling 3.0 FlashInclusionAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
42.0%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableK-EXAONE 2.0LG AI ResearchCarried from an upstream page
42.0%
Not reportedOpen
70Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
41.3%
Not reportedClosed
71A.X K2SK TelecomIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
41.0%
Not reportedOpen
72Trinity-Large-ThinkingArcee AIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
40.6%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableTrinity-Large-PreviewArcee AICarried from an upstream page
40.6%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNemotron 3 UltraNVIDIACarried from an upstream page
40.3%
Not reportedOpen
73Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
40.2%
Not reportedOpen
74Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
40.0%
Not reportedOpen
75Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
39.7%
Not reportedOpen
76Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9BNVIDIAIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
39.7%
Not reportedOpen
77DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeekIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
39.0%
Not reportedOpen
78GPT-5 miniOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
39.0%
Not reportedClosed
79GPT-OSS 20BOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
38.9%
Not reportedOpen
80Mistral Small 4MistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
38.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNorth Mini CodeCohereCarried from an upstream page
38.8%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)MistralCarried from an upstream page
38.8%
Not reportedOpen
81Mercury 2.5InceptionIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
38.5%
Not reportedClosed
82Command A+CohereIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
38.5%
Not reportedOpen
83Granite 4.2 30BIBMIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
37.8%
Not reportedOpen
84Mercury 2InceptionIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
37.7%
Not reportedClosed
85Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibabaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
36.6%
Not reportedOpen
86Mistral Large 3MistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
36.6%
Not reportedOpen
87DeepSeek V3DeepSeekIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
35.8%
Not reportedOpen
88GPT-OSS 120BOpenAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
34.0%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B NVFP4NVIDIACarried from an upstream page
32.1%
Not reportedOpen
89Llama 4 MaverickMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
31.7%
Not reportedOpen
90Granite 4.2 8BIBMIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
31.5%
Not reportedOpen
91Mistral Small 3.1MistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
27.8%
Not reportedOpen
92MiniCPM5-2BOpenBMBIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
26.3%
Not reportedOpen
93Solar Pro 3UpstageIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
25.5%
Not reportedClosed
94Granite 4.2 3BIBMIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
25.3%
Not reportedOpen
95Gemma 4 E4BGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
24.4%
Not reportedOpen
96Ling 3.0 TinyInclusionAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
24.2%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)MistralCarried from an upstream page
23.8%
Not reportedOpen
97Ministral 3 14BMistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
23.8%
Not reportedOpen
98Gemma 3 27BGoogleIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
23.3%
Not reportedOpen
99Celeris-1CelerisIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
21.6%
Not reportedClosed
100Llama 4 ScoutMetaIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
21.3%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableMinistral 3 8B (Reasoning)MistralCarried from an upstream page
20.7%
Not reportedOpen
101Ministral 3 8BMistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
20.7%
Not reportedOpen
No rank on this tableMinistral 3 3B (Reasoning)MistralCarried from an upstream page
15.3%
Not reportedOpen
102Ministral 3 3BMistralIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
15.3%
Not reportedOpen
103LFM2.5-2.6BLiquidAIIndependent run: Artificial Analysis
14.4%
Not reportedOpen

A dash in the rank column marks a result carried from an upstream page, where who ran it is not recorded. It keeps its place by score, without a rank on this table.

  • Lab-reported
  • Benchmark-run
  • Independent
What the labels mean

According to BenchLM.ai, Claude Fable 5.2 leads the AA-SciCode benchmark with a score of 67.7%, followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (66.9%) and Claude Fable 5.1 (63.1%). The scores show moderate spread, with meaningful differences between the top tier and mid-tier models.

124 models have been evaluated on AA-SciCode. The benchmark falls in the Coding category. BenchAlign v5.8 gives AA-SciCode 5% of the Coding reference weight, so it moves the Coding leaderboard and the overall ranking. Reference weights are relative weights in the calibrated model, not fixed shares of a score.

About AA-SciCode

Year

2026

Tasks

Scientific coding subproblems

Format

Task success rate

Difficulty

Scientific programming

BenchLM stores the Artificial Analysis SciCode result separately from the core SciCode lane because Artificial Analysis controls the evaluation configuration.

Freshness and provenance

Version

AA-SciCode 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

Current

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does AA-SciCode measure?

An Artificial Analysis SciCode score.

Which model scores highest on AA-SciCode?

Claude Fable 5.2 by Anthropic currently leads with a score of 67.7% on AA-SciCode.

How many models are evaluated on AA-SciCode?

124 AI models have published results on AA-SciCode in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: November 13, 2026 · BenchLM version AA-SciCode 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.