Skip to main content

BenchLM recommendation

Best LLMs for Research in 2026

Data verified

As of July 13, 2026, the top model in best llms for research on the BenchLM leaderboard is GPT-5.6 Sol with a score of 93.4.

Last verified: July 13, 2026

Research work stresses two things at once: deep, reliable knowledge (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, frontier-science evaluations) and the ability to actually go find and synthesize sources (BrowseComp, DeepSearch-QA, GAIA). This reporting family blends both, weighted toward the hard-knowledge and browsing benchmarks that separate research-grade models from good chat models.

This page ranks models using only sourced benchmarks in the research reporting family — hard knowledge plus agentic web research — rather than the full provisional leaderboard.

Bottom line: research is where frontier reasoning models earn their premium — the HLE and BrowseComp leaders below are the models that can both know and find.

According to BenchLM.ai, GPT-5.6 Sol leads this ranking with a score of 93.4, followed by GPT-5.6 Terra (90.2) and GPT-5.6 Luna (87.8). There is meaningful separation between the top models, suggesting genuine performance differences.

The best open-weight option is MiMo-V2-Flash (ranked #5 with a score of 84). While proprietary models lead, open-weight options are within striking distance for teams willing to trade a few points of performance for full model control.

This ranking is based on provisional overall weighted scores across BenchLM.ai's scoring formula tracked by BenchLM.ai. For detailed model profiles, click any model name below. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

How to choose

Full Rankings (63 models)

1
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

93.4

sourced avg

2
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

90.2

sourced avg

3
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

87.8

sourced avg

4
MAI-Thinking-1
Microsoft·Proprietary·256K

84.4

sourced avg

5
MiMo-V2-Flash
Xiaomi·Open Weight·256K

84

sourced avg

6
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun·Open Weight·256K

82.6

sourced avg

7
Claude Mythos 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M+

82.2

sourced avg

8
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M+

82

sourced avg

9
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

81.2

sourced avg

10
GPT-5.2
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

79.1

sourced avg

11
Qwen3 235B 2507
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

78.9

sourced avg

12
Gemma 4 12B
Google·Open Weight·256K

78.4

sourced avg

13
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

76.8

sourced avg

14
GPT-5.5
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

76.7

sourced avg

15
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

76.1

sourced avg

16
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

76.1

sourced avg

17
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

76

sourced avg

18
GPT-5.4
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

75.5

sourced avg

19
Qwen3.5-27B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

75.1

sourced avg

20
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

74.4

sourced avg

21
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

73.7

sourced avg

22
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

73.6

sourced avg

23
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
NVIDIA·Open Weight·256K

73.5

sourced avg

24
GLM-5.2
Z.AI·Open Weight·1M

73

sourced avg

25
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

72.1

sourced avg

26
ZAYA1-8B
Zyphra·Open Weight·131K

71.8

sourced avg

27
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta·Proprietary·1M

71.2

sourced avg

28
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

71.1

sourced avg

29
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

70.8

sourced avg

30
GLM-5
Z.AI·Open Weight·200K

70.7

sourced avg

31
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

70.1

sourced avg

32
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

69.9

sourced avg

33
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

67.5

sourced avg

34
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

66.2

sourced avg

35
Qwen3.7 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

66.2

sourced avg

36
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

64.8

sourced avg

37
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

64.7

sourced avg

38
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

64.7

sourced avg

39
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

63.7

sourced avg

40
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

63.3

sourced avg

41
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

63.3

sourced avg

42
Grok 4.3
xAI·Proprietary·1M

62.5

sourced avg

43
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

62.5

sourced avg

44
Agents-A1
InternScience·Open Weight·262K

61.6

sourced avg

45
Gemma 4 E4B
Google·Open Weight·128K

61.3

sourced avg

46
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

60.3

sourced avg

47
GLM-5.1
Z.AI·Open Weight·203K

60.2

sourced avg

48
Muse Spark
Meta·Proprietary·262K

60.2

sourced avg

49
Qwen3.6-27B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

60.2

sourced avg

50
ZAYA1-74B-Preview
Zyphra·Open Weight·256K

60

sourced avg

51
DeepSeek V4 Flash (High)
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

59.7

sourced avg

52
Gemma 4 31B
Google·Open Weight·256K

59.7

sourced avg

53
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Alibaba·Open Weight·262K

58.2

sourced avg

54
GLM-4.7
Z.AI·Open Weight·200K

57.2

sourced avg

55
Hy3 Preview
Tencent·Open Weight·256K

56.4

sourced avg

56
Nemotron 3 Ultra
NVIDIA·Open Weight·1M

56.1

sourced avg

57
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

50.9

sourced avg

58
Gemma 4 E2B
Google·Open Weight·128K

47.6

sourced avg

59
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

46.4

sourced avg

60
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

45.8

sourced avg

61
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Google·Open Weight·256K

33.6

sourced avg

62
LFM2.5-230M
LiquidAI·Open Weight·32K

24.1

sourced avg

63
LFM2.5-VL-450M
LiquidAI·Open Weight·128K

24.1

sourced avg

These rankings update weekly

Get notified when models move. One email a week with what changed and why.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Key Takeaways

The top model on this sourced reporting-family slice is GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI with an average of 93.4.

The best open-weight model is MiMo-V2-Flash at position #5.

63 models are listed with sourced benchmark coverage in this reporting family.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

This is a reporting-family ranking: a weighted average of sourced hard-knowledge and agentic-research benchmarks. It rewards models that combine deep knowledge with the ability to search, browse, and synthesize.

Known limitations

Research quality also depends on the harness (search tools, retrieval, citations UI), which benchmarks only partly capture. Models need sourced coverage on at least a quarter of the family to appear.

Best LLMs for Research FAQ

What is the best LLM for research?

The top rows of this table lead the sourced blend of hard-knowledge (GPQA, HLE) and agentic-research (BrowseComp, DeepSearch-QA) benchmarks — the two capabilities research work actually stresses. The ranking recomputes on every data refresh; check the answer box above for the current leader.

What is the best AI for deep research?

Deep-research products bundle a model with a browsing-and-synthesis harness, so pick from the BrowseComp and DeepSearch-QA leaders here, then compare the products built on them. A strong model in a weak harness will still miss sources; benchmark scores set the ceiling, the product sets how close you get.

Can I trust LLM citations in research?

Only after verification. Even the top HLE scorers fabricate citations at a nonzero rate, and browsing-enabled models can misread the sources they find. Use models from this table to draft and discover, and verify every load-bearing citation before it ships — the leaders lower the error rate, none eliminate it.

What is the best free LLM for research?

The strongest open-weight rows in this family can be self-hosted at no per-token cost — check which open models appear in the table, then see the open-source rankings and local LLM guide for hardware requirements. For occasional use, most frontier providers offer rate-limited free tiers of their chat products.

Last updated: July 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.