Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation (τ²-bench results)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

This route is a sourced ledger for published τ²-bench results. Most current rows come from Artificial Analysis's telecom implementation, while named provider rows can use telecom, airline, retail, or aggregate setups.

Benchmark score on τ²-bench sourced results — October 28, 2026

We compile the τ²-bench sourced results rows from provider self-reports and secondary reports. The table contains 168 models. GLM-5.2 has the highest published score at 99.1%, but the available coverage and evaluation setups do not establish a market leader. We do not use these results to rank models overall.

168 modelsAgenticCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 28, 2026

Benchmark score table (168 models)

Benchmark score results for τ²-bench results
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1GLM-5.2Z.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
99.1%
Not reportedOpen
2GPT-5.4OpenAIτ²-bench Telecom
98.9%
Not reportedClosed
3GLM-4.7-FlashZ.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.8%
Not reportedOpen
4Claude Fable 5AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.5%
Not reportedClosed
5GLM-5-TurboZ.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.5%
Not reportedClosed
6GLM-5V-TurboZ.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.5%
Not reportedClosed
7Step 3.7 FlashStepFunArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.5%
Not reportedOpen
8GLM-5Z.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
98.2%
Not reportedOpen
9GPT-5.5OpenAIτ²-bench Telecom
98%
Not reportedClosed
10Qwen3.6 PlusAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
97.7%
Not reportedClosed
11GLM-5.1Z.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
97.7%
Not reportedOpen
12Grok 4.3xAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
97.7%
Not reportedClosed
13DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
96.2%
Not reportedOpen
14Kimi K2.6Moonshot AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.9%
Not reportedOpen
15Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Moonshot AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.9%
Not reportedClosed
16Kimi K2.5Moonshot AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.9%
Not reportedOpen
17GLM-4.7Z.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.9%
Not reportedOpen
18Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)AlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.9%
Not reportedClosed
19Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleτ²-bench published setup
95.6%
Not reportedClosed
20Qwen3.5 397BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.6%
Not reportedOpen
21Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)AlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.6%
Not reportedOpen
22Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.3%
Not reportedClosed
23Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.3%
Not reportedOpen
24MiniMax M2.5MiniMaxArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95.3%
Not reportedClosed
25MiMo-V2-ProXiaomiArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
95%
Not reportedClosed
26Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.7%
Not reportedClosed
27Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.4%
Not reportedClosed
28Qwen3.6-27BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.2%
Not reportedOpen
29MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.2%
Not reportedClosed
30Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.2%
Not reportedOpen
31DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
94.2%
Not reportedOpen
32Qwen3.5-27BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
93.9%
Not reportedOpen
33Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
93.6%
Not reportedOpen
34GPT-5.4 miniOpenAIτ²-bench Telecom
93.4%
Not reportedClosed
35Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)xAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
93.3%
Not reportedClosed
36Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
93%
Not reportedClosed
37GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIτ²-bench Telecom
92.5%
Not reportedClosed
38GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
92.1%
Not reportedClosed
39Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
92.1%
Not reportedClosed
40Qwen3.5-4BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
92.1%
Not reportedOpen
41Muse SparkMetaτ²-bench published setup
91.5%
Not reportedClosed
42MiMo-V2-OmniXiaomiArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
91.2%
Not reportedClosed
43Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
90.1%
Not reportedOpen
44Trinity-Large-ThinkingArcee AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
90.1%
Not reportedOpen
45Trinity-Large-PreviewArcee AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
90.1%
Not reportedOpen
46Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
89.5%
Not reportedClosed
47Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
89.2%
Not reportedOpen
48MiniMax M3MiniMaxArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
88.9%
Not reportedOpen
49Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
88.6%
Not reportedClosed
50LFM2.5-8B-A1BLiquidAIτ²-bench Telecom
88.1%
Not reportedOpen
51Step 3.5 FlashStepFunArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
87.4%
Not reportedOpen
52Gemini 3 ProGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
87.1%
Not reportedClosed
53Spark-X2.6-4BSparkLLMτ²-bench published setup
86.9%
Not reportedOpen
54GPT-5 (medium)OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86.5%
Not reportedClosed
55GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86.3%
Not reportedClosed
56Claude Opus 4.5AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86.3%
Not reportedClosed
57Solar Pro 3UpstageArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86.3%
Not reportedClosed
58GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86%
Not reportedClosed
59Ling 2.6 FlashInclusionAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86%
Not reportedOpen
60GPT-5.3-Codex-SparkOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
86%
Not reportedClosed
61GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
85.1%
Not reportedClosed
62Command A+Cohereτ²-bench Telecom
85%
Not reportedOpen
63Claude Opus 4.6AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
84.8%
Not reportedClosed
64MiniMax M2.7MiniMaxArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
84.8%
Not reportedOpen
65GPT-5.2OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
84.8%
Not reportedClosed
66GPT-5 (high)OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
84.8%
Not reportedClosed
67MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
83.9%
Not reportedOpen
68Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIAArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
83.3%
Not reportedOpen
69GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
83%
Not reportedClosed
70GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
83%
Not reportedClosed
71GPT-5.1OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
81.9%
Not reportedClosed
72o3OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
80.7%
Not reportedClosed
73LLaDA2.2-flashInclusionAIτ²-bench published setup
80.3%
Not reportedOpen
74Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism MLτ²-bench Telecom
80.2%
Not reportedOpen
75Claude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
79.5%
Not reportedClosed
76DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
78.9%
Not reportedOpen
77Agents-A1-4BInternScienceτ²-bench published setup
78.2%
Not reportedOpen
78GLM-4.6Z.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
76.9%
Not reportedOpen
79Grok Code Fast 1xAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
75.7%
Not reportedClosed
80Grok 4xAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
74.9%
Not reportedClosed
81Qwen3 MaxAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
74.3%
Not reportedClosed
82K-ExaoneLG AI ResearchArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
74.3%
Not reportedClosed
83Claude Opus 4.7AnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
74%
Not reportedClosed
84Claude 4 Opus ThinkingAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
73.4%
Not reportedClosed
85Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
71.4%
Not reportedClosed
86Mercury 2InceptionArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
70.8%
Not reportedClosed
87GPT-5 miniOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
68.4%
Not reportedClosed
88GPT-OSS 120BOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
65.8%
Not reportedOpen
89Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)xAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
65.8%
Not reportedClosed
90Grok 4.1 FastxAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
63.7%
Not reportedClosed
91o1OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
62.6%
Not reportedClosed
92Kimi K2Moonshot AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
61.1%
Not reportedClosed
93GPT-OSS 20BOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
60.2%
Not reportedOpen
94Gemma 4 31BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
59.9%
Not reportedOpen
95LLaDA2.2-miniInclusionAIτ²-bench published setup
57.5%
Not reportedOpen
96o4-miniOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
55.6%
Not reportedClosed
97Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B BF16NVIDIAτ²-bench published setup
55.1%
Not reportedOpen
98Claude 3.7 Sonnet ThinkingAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
54.7%
Not reportedClosed
99Gemini 2.5 ProGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
54.1%
Not reportedClosed
100GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
52.9%
Not reportedClosed
101Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4BNVIDIAτ²-bench published setup
52.3%
Not reportedOpen
102Claude 4 SonnetAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
52.3%
Not reportedClosed
103Claude 3.7 SonnetAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
50%
Not reportedClosed
104GPT-4.1OpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
47.1%
Not reportedClosed
105DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
47.1%
Not reportedOpen
106Sarvam 105BSarvamArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
46.8%
Not reportedOpen
107GLM-4.5-AirZ.AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
46.5%
Not reportedClosed
108Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNVIDIAτ²-bench Telecom
45.3%
Not reportedOpen
109Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
43.6%
Not reportedOpen
110Gemini 3 FlashGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
43.3%
Not reportedClosed
111Mistral Small 4MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
41.2%
Not reportedOpen
112DeepSeek V3.1 (Reasoning)DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
37.4%
Not reportedOpen
113North Mini CodeCohereArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
37.4%
Not reportedOpen
114DeepSeek-R1DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
36.5%
Not reportedOpen
115GPT-5 nanoOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
36.5%
Not reportedClosed
116Gemma 4 12BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
36.3%
Not reportedOpen
117DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
34.8%
Not reportedOpen
118Sarvam 30BSarvamArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
34.5%
Not reportedOpen
119MiniMax M1 80kMiniMaxArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
34.2%
Not reportedClosed
120Solar Pro 2UpstageArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
31.9%
Not reportedClosed
121Mistral Large 2MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
30.7%
Not reportedClosed
122Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
29.5%
Not reportedClosed
123o3-miniOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
28.7%
Not reportedClosed
124Devstral SmallMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
28.4%
Not reportedOpen
125Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
27.2%
Not reportedOpen
126Ministral 3 14BMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
27.2%
Not reportedOpen
127Llama 3.3 70BMetaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
26.6%
Not reportedOpen
128Magistral SmallMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
26.6%
Not reportedOpen
129Ultravox v0.6 Llama 3.3 70BFixie AIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
26.6%
Not reportedOpen
130Ministral 3 8B (Reasoning)MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
26.6%
Not reportedOpen
131Ministral 3 8BMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
26.6%
Not reportedOpen
132Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNVIDIAArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
25.4%
Not reportedOpen
133GPT-4oOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
25.1%
Not reportedClosed
134Mistral Small 3.1MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
25.1%
Not reportedOpen
135Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
24.9%
Not reportedOpen
136Ministral 3 3BMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
24.9%
Not reportedOpen
137Mistral Large 3MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
24.6%
Not reportedClosed
138Claude 3.5 HaikuAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
24.6%
Not reportedClosed
139Mistral Medium 3MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
24.3%
Not reportedClosed
140Magistral MediumMistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
23.1%
Not reportedClosed
141DeepSeek V3DeepSeekArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
22.8%
Not reportedOpen
142Llama 3.1 70BMetaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
21.6%
Not reportedOpen
143Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-ThinkingAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
21.3%
Not reportedOpen
144Claude 3 HaikuAnthropicArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
21.1%
Not reportedClosed
145Gemma 4 E4BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
20.8%
Not reportedOpen
146Gemma 4 E2BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
20.8%
Not reportedOpen
147Exaone 4.0 1.2BLG AI ResearchArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
20.5%
Not reportedOpen
148Granite-4.0-H-1BIBMArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
19.6%
Not reportedOpen
149LFM2.5-1.2B-ThinkingLiquidAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
19.6%
Not reportedClosed
150Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
19%
Not reportedClosed
151Llama 3.1 405BMetaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
19%
Not reportedOpen
152Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)MistralArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
18.4%
Not reportedOpen
153Llama 4 MaverickMetaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
17.8%
Not reportedOpen
154GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
17.3%
Not reportedClosed
155Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-InstructAlibabaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
16.4%
Not reportedOpen
156Llama 4 ScoutMetaArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
15.5%
Not reportedOpen
157Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
14.9%
Not reportedClosed
158Granite-4.0-H-350MIBMArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
14.6%
Not reportedOpen
159Nova ProAmazonArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
14%
Not reportedClosed
160Granite-4.0-350MIBMArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
13.2%
Not reportedOpen
161Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIAArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
11.4%
Not reportedOpen
162LFM2-24B-A2BLiquidAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
11.1%
Not reportedClosed
163LFM2.5-1.2B-InstructLiquidAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
10.8%
Not reportedClosed
164Gemma 3 27BGoogleArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
10.5%
Not reportedOpen
165LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractLiquidAIArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
8.5%
Not reportedOpen
166Exaone 4.0 32BLG AI ResearchArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
4.1%
Not reportedOpen
167Phi-4MicrosoftArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
0%
Not reportedOpen
168Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoftArtificial Analysis τ²-bench
0%
Not reportedOpen

How to read this leaderboard

Editorial review by Glevd · 2026-07-15

Use a row only with its attached source and setup label. Match the domain, task release, agent model, user-simulator model, scaffold, prompts, trial count, and pass^k metric before comparing scores. The sorted table is a source ledger, not a controlled cross-provider ranking.

Operator receipt: 168 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the highest published score among these 168 models is GLM-5.2 at 99.1%, which does not establish a market leader.

Honest limit: The page mixes a large third-party telecom snapshot with smaller provider-published slices. Those sources do not use one guaranteed-common harness or reporting policy, and BenchLM did not rerun them. A higher number can reflect a different user model, prompt, domain, task release, or repeat policy.

Among the reported τ²-bench results rows, GLM-5.2 is first at 99.1%. The third row is 0.3 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 1.4 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

168 models have been evaluated on τ²-bench results. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. τ²-bench results is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About τ²-bench results

Year

2025

Tasks

Airline, retail, and telecom customer-service task sets

Format

Published domain success or pass^k results

Difficulty

Dual-control customer-service workflows

τ²-bench extends the original benchmark with a dual-control telecom domain where the agent and simulated user can both act through tools. The maintained framework also includes airline and retail. BenchLM keeps each exact source attached and labels the published setup instead of treating every row as one controlled run.

Freshness and provenance

Version

τ²-Bench 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

Are all τ²-bench scores directly comparable?

No. Match the domain, task release, agent model, user model, scaffold, prompts, number of trials, and pass^k definition. BenchLM labels each sourced row so a telecom result or third-party implementation is not silently treated as the same setup as an airline, retail, or aggregate result.

Does a high τ²-bench score prove production support reliability?

No. It measures success in simulated customer-service environments under a reported setup. Production identity checks, permission boundaries, changing policies, latency, cost, monitoring, and human escalation still need separate testing.

Last updated: October 28, 2026 · BenchLM version τ²-Bench 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.